CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or e...
Start Learning for Free
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract
Reason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong
- a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- c)(A) is true (R) is wrong
- d)(A) is wrong (R) is true
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort ...
The Assertions talks that in breach of contract only nominal damages are given and not Vindicative or Exemplare i.e revenge or to set an example type of damages are awarded
The reason tells that it is because a breach of contract doesn't give damages as punishments
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort ...
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract.
Reason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong.
The correct answer is option 'A'. Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Explanation:
Understanding the Assertion:
The assertion states that vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract. This means that in contract law, the concept of awarding vindictive or exemplary damages is not recognized or applied.
Understanding the Reason:
The reason provided is that the award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong. This means that when a contract is breached, the purpose of awarding damages is not to punish the party at fault, but rather to compensate the non-breaching party for the loss or harm suffered as a result of the breach.
Explanation of the Assertion and Reason:
In contract law, the primary objective of awarding damages is to compensate the aggrieved party for the loss or harm suffered due to the breach of contract. The aim is to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed as agreed. Unlike tort law, where punitive or exemplary damages may be awarded to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from similar conduct, contract law focuses on compensatory damages.
While contract law recognizes and allows for various types of damages such as general damages, special damages, and nominal damages, the concept of vindictive or exemplary damages is generally not applicable in contract disputes. The purpose of damages in contract law is not to punish the breaching party, but rather to restore the non-breaching party to the position they would have been in if the contract had been fulfilled.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the assertion that vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract is true. The reason provided, which states that the award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong, is the correct explanation for this assertion.
Reason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong.
The correct answer is option 'A'. Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Explanation:
Understanding the Assertion:
The assertion states that vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract. This means that in contract law, the concept of awarding vindictive or exemplary damages is not recognized or applied.
Understanding the Reason:
The reason provided is that the award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong. This means that when a contract is breached, the purpose of awarding damages is not to punish the party at fault, but rather to compensate the non-breaching party for the loss or harm suffered as a result of the breach.
Explanation of the Assertion and Reason:
In contract law, the primary objective of awarding damages is to compensate the aggrieved party for the loss or harm suffered due to the breach of contract. The aim is to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed as agreed. Unlike tort law, where punitive or exemplary damages may be awarded to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from similar conduct, contract law focuses on compensatory damages.
While contract law recognizes and allows for various types of damages such as general damages, special damages, and nominal damages, the concept of vindictive or exemplary damages is generally not applicable in contract disputes. The purpose of damages in contract law is not to punish the breaching party, but rather to restore the non-breaching party to the position they would have been in if the contract had been fulfilled.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the assertion that vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract is true. The reason provided, which states that the award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong, is the correct explanation for this assertion.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup