CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promise... Start Learning for Free
Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.         
  • a)
    Here are the fifty-dollar
  • b)
    bill that I promised for
  • c)
    pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack
  • d)
    Russell terrier, this weekend.
  • e)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, ...
The correct option is A.
Fifty dollar bill is a singular, ‘are’ should be replaced by ‘is’
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, ...
The correct option is A.
Fifty dollar bill is a singular, ‘are’ should be replaced by ‘is’
Free Test
Community Answer
Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, ...
Answer:

Explanation:
- The correct part of the sentence that matches the given question is option 'A', which reads: "Here are the fifty-dollar".
- Let's break down the sentence to understand why this is the correct answer.

Identifying the Subject:
- The subject of the sentence is "Here are the fifty-dollar bill" which indicates that the speaker is presenting something to the listener.

Clarifying the Purpose:
- The purpose of the statement is to hand over a fifty-dollar bill to the listener for pet sitting Bo-Bo, a Jack Russell terrier, over the weekend.

Confirming the Action:
- The action being taken in the sentence is the presentation of the fifty-dollar bill, fulfilling the promise made by the speaker.

Summarizing the Sentence:
- In summary, the sentence confirms the delivery of the agreed-upon payment for taking care of the Jack Russell terrier, Bo-Bo, during the weekend.
Therefore, based on the analysis of the sentence, option 'A' is the correct choice as it accurately reflects the intended message of the speaker regarding the payment for pet sitting services.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The term indemnity literally means security against loss. In a contract of indemnity, one party, i.e. the indemnifier, promise to compensate the other party, i.e. the indemnified, against the loss suffered by the other. The English law defines a contract of indemnity as a promise to save a person harmless from the consequences of an act. Thus, it includes within its ambit losses caused not merely by human agency, but also those caused by accident or fire or other natural calamities. As per Section 124 of the Contract Act, a contract of indemnity is that contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person.The definition provided by the Indian Contract Act confines itself to the losses occasioned due to the act of the promisor or due to the act of any other person. Under a contract of indemnity, liability of the promisor arises from loss caused to the promisee by the conduct of the promisor himself, or as per the terms in the indemnity contract. Every contract of insurance, other than life insurance, is a contract of indemnity. The definition is restricted to cases where loss has been caused by some human agency.Section 124 deals with one particular kind of indemnity which arises from a promise made by an indemnifier to save the indemnified from the loss caused to him by the conduct of the indemnifier himself or by the conduct of any other person, but does not deal with those classes of cases where the indemnity arises from loss caused by events or accidents which do not depend upon the conduct of indemnifier or any other person.In a contract of indemnity, there are two parties, i.e. indemnifier and indemnified. A contract of guarantee involves three parties, i.e. creditor, principal debtor and surety. An indemnity is for reimbursement of a loss, while a guarantee is for security of the creditor. In a contract of indemnity, the liability of the indemnifier is primary and arises when the contingent event occurs. In case of contract of guarantee, the liability of surety is secondary and arises when the principal debtor defaults. The indemnifier after performing his part of the promise has no rights against the third party and he can sue the third party only if there is an assignment in his favour. Whereas in a contract of guarantee, the surety steps into the shoes of the creditor on discharge of his liability, and may sue the principal debtor.Q.A promises B to indemnify him in case his house is damaged by fire. B negligently lights up a firecracker in his house and burns it down. Now B wants to claim indemnity. Can B claim the reimbursement?

Indemnity can be treated as a sub-species of compensation and a Contract of Indemnity is a species of contracts. The obligation to indemnify is a voluntary obligation taken by the Indemnifier. The mere possibility of loss occurring will not make the indemnifier liable. The loss to the indemnity holder is essential, otherwise, the indemnifier cannot be held liable. Plus, the loss must arise due to the conduct of the indemnifier or any other person related. Strictly speaking this does not cover the acts of God; otherwise, various insurance transactions will be rendered untenable. Under Indian law, the definition of contract of indemnity is restricted to cases wherein the loss is caused by human agency. Losses from other causes are covered in other chapters of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.Contract of Indemnity should have all the essentials of a valid contract like free consent, the legality of an object, etc. Consideration, in this case, can be anything done, or any promise made which serves as a motivation behind the contract. It is sufficient inducement that the person for whom the indemnifier has promised indemnity has received a benefit or that the indemnity holder has suffered an inconvenience of doing what the indemnifier asks. The indemnity may be for the loss which a party may sustain due to the conduct of the promisor himself or of any other person. As stated earlier, this provision restricts the scope of contracts of indemnity as it covers the loss caused by a human agency only, i.e., by the conduct of the promisor or of any other person. However, the general definition of the contract of indemnity is much wider and it also covers the losses caused by the acts other than human beings.So, we can say that if one person promises to save other from the loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other person subject to the condition if promisee (indemnity holder) work within the scope of the promisor.Q. B requests A to sell and deliver to him goods on credit. A agrees to do so, provided C will guarantee the payment of the price of the goods. C promises to guarantee the payment in consideration of A's promise to deliver the goods. With reference to the passage decide.

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The term indemnity literally means security against loss. In a contract of indemnity, one party, i.e. the indemnifier, promise to compensate the other party, i.e. the indemnified, against the loss suffered by the other. The English law defines a contract of indemnity as a promise to save a person harmless from the consequences of an act. Thus, it includes within its ambit losses caused not merely by human agency, but also those caused by accident or fire or other natural calamities. As per Section 124 of the Contract Act, a contract of indemnity is that contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person.The definition provided by the Indian Contract Act confines itself to the losses occasioned due to the act of the promisor or due to the act of any other person. Under a contract of indemnity, liability of the promisor arises from loss caused to the promisee by the conduct of the promisor himself, or as per the terms in the indemnity contract. Every contract of insurance, other than life insurance, is a contract of indemnity. The definition is restricted to cases where loss has been caused by some human agency.Section 124 deals with one particular kind of indemnity which arises from a promise made by an indemnifier to save the indemnified from the loss caused to him by the conduct of the indemnifier himself or by the conduct of any other person, but does not deal with those classes of cases where the indemnity arises from loss caused by events or accidents which do not depend upon the conduct of indemnifier or any other person.In a contract of indemnity, there are two parties, i.e. indemnifier and indemnified. A contract of guarantee involves three parties, i.e. creditor, principal debtor and surety. An indemnity is for reimbursement of a loss, while a guarantee is for security of the creditor. In a contract of indemnity, the liability of the indemnifier is primary and arises when the contingent event occurs. In case of contract of guarantee, the liability of surety is secondary and arises when the principal debtor defaults. The indemnifier after performing his part of the promise has no rights against the third party and he can sue the third party only if there is an assignment in his favour. Whereas in a contract of guarantee, the surety steps into the shoes of the creditor on discharge of his liability, and may sue the principal debtor.Q. Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The term indemnity literally means security against loss. In a contract of indemnity, one party, i.e. the indemnifier, promise to compensate the other party, i.e. the indemnified, against the loss suffered by the other. The English law defines a contract of indemnity as a promise to save a person harmless from the consequences of an act. Thus, it includes within its ambit losses caused not merely by human agency, but also those caused by accident or fire or other natural calamities. As per Section 124 of the Contract Act, a contract of indemnity is that contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person.The definition provided by the Indian Contract Act confines itself to the losses occasioned due to the act of the promisor or due to the act of any other person. Under a contract of indemnity, liability of the promisor arises from loss caused to the promisee by the conduct of the promisor himself, or as per the terms in the indemnity contract. Every contract of insurance, other than life insurance, is a contract of indemnity. The definition is restricted to cases where loss has been caused by some human agency.Section 124 deals with one particular kind of indemnity which arises from a promise made by an indemnifier to save the indemnified from the loss caused to him by the conduct of the indemnifier himself or by the conduct of any other person, but does not deal with those classes of cases where the indemnity arises from loss caused by events or accidents which do not depend upon the conduct of indemnifier or any other person.In a contract of indemnity, there are two parties, i.e. indemnifier and indemnified. A contract of guarantee involves three parties, i.e. creditor, principal debtor and surety. An indemnity is for reimbursement of a loss, while a guarantee is for security of the creditor. In a contract of indemnity, the liability of the indemnifier is primary and arises when the contingent event occurs. In case of contract of guarantee, the liability of surety is secondary and arises when the principal debtor defaults. The indemnifier after performing his part of the promise has no rights against the third party and he can sue the third party only if there is an assignment in his favour. Whereas in a contract of guarantee, the surety steps into the shoes of the creditor on discharge of his liability, and may sue the principal debtor.Q. A promises B to indemnify him in case his house is damaged by fire. B negligently lights up a firecracker in his house and burns it down. Now B wants to claim indemnity. Can B claim the reimbursement?

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.It is quite timely that the Interdepartmental Group of the RBI has released a report on the internationalization of the rupee. The talk of making currencies international has gathered momentum ever since the US put an embargo on dealing with Russia. By blocking all payments through the SWIFT system to Russia, the message sent was this can happen to any country. This has led countries to seriously discuss the issue of de-dollarisation, with the internationalization of local currency as part of the package. If a group of countries decides to conduct business with one another in their currencies, then an optimal solution can be achieved. But the issue is that there will always be surpluses with some countries and deficits for others. Those with a deficit are better off using such arrangements while those with surpluses may not know how to use the currencies as they are not acceptable outside this perimeter. Therefore, while the regulation on foreigners or Indians holding rupees outside India can be liberalized, getting countries to accept the same is the challenge. Currently, one is not allowed to carry more than 25,000 outside the country. An argument put forward often is that this should be withdrawn because if there are takers for the same outside, it saves dollars for the country.There are some interesting facts that need to be considered when one looks at the internationalization of currencies. The first is that today around 60 percent of the world’s forex reserves are held in dollars,20 percent in euros, and 55.5 percent in yen and pounds each. Hence 90 percent of the holdings are in these four currencies. While China has tried its best to make inroads, the share of its currency is a mere 2.6 percent; slightly higher than the Canadian and the Australian dollar at 2.4 percent and 2 percent, respectively. Therefore, the size of the economy does not matter today. China, despite being the second largest economy, is unable to find greater global acceptance of its currency. Second, the structure of exports throws light on another aspect of global currencies. If a country exports a lot of goods, then there can be an incentive for countries to accept the currency as a mode of payment. World Bank data for 2021 shows that the euro region accounted for 26 percent of total global exports of $28.16 trillion. The US accounts for a share of only 9 percent, but the dollar is favored globally when it comes to holding forex reserves. China has the second-highest share in exports of 13.6 percent, but accounts for a much lower share in forex reserves. Japan follows next with 3.2 percent, Singapore 2.8 percent, South Korea 2.7 percent, Hong Kong 2.7 percent and India with 2.4 percent. Canada, Singapore and Russia had shares of around 2 percent each while Australia had a share of just 1.2 percent. The Australian dollar, however, is a preferred currency by the IMF when it comes to forex reserve holdings. India comes 9th in this ranking, and can hence pitch for inclusion as an international currency.Q.Which of the following statements, when considered in the context of the passage, undermines the notion that the stability and trustworthiness of the US dollar as a reserve currency, supported by the economic and geopolitical influence of the United States, make it the preferred choice for global investors and central banks?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The term indemnity literally means security against loss. In a contract of indemnity, one party, i.e. the indemnifier, promise to compensate the other party, i.e. the indemnified, against the loss suffered by the other. The English law defines a contract of indemnity as a promise to save a person harmless from the consequences of an act. Thus, it includes within its ambit losses caused not merely by human agency, but also those caused by accident or fire or other natural calamities. As per Section 124 of the Contract Act, a contract of indemnity is that contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person.The definition provided by the Indian Contract Act confines itself to the losses occasioned due to the act of the promisor or due to the act of any other person. Under a contract of indemnity, liability of the promisor arises from loss caused to the promisee by the conduct of the promisor himself, or as per the terms in the indemnity contract. Every contract of insurance, other than life insurance, is a contract of indemnity. The definition is restricted to cases where loss has been caused by some human agency.Section 124 deals with one particular kind of indemnity which arises from a promise made by an indemnifier to save the indemnified from the loss caused to him by the conduct of the indemnifier himself or by the conduct of any other person, but does not deal with those classes of cases where the indemnity arises from loss caused by events or accidents which do not depend upon the conduct of indemnifier or any other person.In a contract of indemnity, there are two parties, i.e. indemnifier and indemnified. A contract of guarantee involves three parties, i.e. creditor, principal debtor and surety. An indemnity is for reimbursement of a loss, while a guarantee is for security of the creditor. In a contract of indemnity, the liability of the indemnifier is primary and arises when the contingent event occurs. In case of contract of guarantee, the liability of surety is secondary and arises when the principal debtor defaults. The indemnifier after performing his part of the promise has no rights against the third party and he can sue the third party only if there is an assignment in his favour. Whereas in a contract of guarantee, the surety steps into the shoes of the creditor on discharge of his liability, and may sue the principal debtor.Q. A and B enter into a contract of indemnity. A promises B to indemnify B in case of any damage to his car, while he is driving. B's servant crashes the car. Can B claim indemnity?

Top Courses for CLAT

Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Here are the fifty-dollar bill that I promised for pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jack Russell terrier, this weekend.a)Here are the fifty-dollarb)bill that I promised forc)pet sitting Bo-Bo, my Jackd)Russell terrier, this weekend.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev