CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or e... Start Learning for Free
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract
Reason: The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong
  • a)
    Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
  • b)
    Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
  • c)
    (A) is true (R) is wrong
  • d)
    (A) is wrong (R) is true
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort ...
I guess not as punishment for breach of contract but as a compensation.
Free Test
Community Answer
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort ...
Explanation:

Assertion:
As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contract.

Reason:
The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wrong.
Explanation:
- Vindictive or exemplary damages in tort: In tort law, vindictive or exemplary damages are sometimes awarded to punish the defendant for intentional or reckless wrongdoing, and to deter others from engaging in similar conduct. These damages are meant to go beyond compensating the plaintiff for their loss.
- Damages in case of breach of contract: In contrast, damages awarded in cases of breach of contract are primarily meant to compensate the innocent party for the loss suffered due to the breach. The aim is to put the injured party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed as agreed.
- Key difference: While tort law focuses on punishing and deterring wrongful behavior through vindictive or exemplary damages, contract law is more concerned with compensating the injured party for their losses.
Therefore, the assertion is true because vindictive or exemplary damages are indeed not typically awarded in contract law, as the primary purpose of damages in contract cases is compensation rather than punishment.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Assertion: As a general rule, vindictive or exemplary damages of tort are unknown in contractReason:The award of damages in case of breach of a contract is made not as a punishment for wronga)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)c)(A) is true (R) is wrongd)(A) is wrong (R) is trueCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev