CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, ...
Start Learning for Free
PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.
FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.
- a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabh
- b)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the car
- c)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.
- d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accident
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things ...
The principle “Qui facit per alium facit per se” means that a person is responsible for the actions of others performed on their behalf. In this case, Nisha asked Saurabh to drive her car to her office. Therefore, even though Saurabh was the one driving, Nisha is responsible for his actions because he was acting under her authority and for her purpose. As a result, Nisha would be liable for the damages caused by Saurabh’s negligent driving.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things ...
's negligent driving. Srikant suffered serious injuries and had to be hospitalized. Srikant filed a lawsuit against Nisha for the injuries suffered by him.
ISSUE: Whether Nisha is liable for the injuries suffered by Srikant due to the negligent driving of Saurabh?
ANALYSIS: The principle of "qui facit per alium facit per se" means that the acts of an agent are considered to be the acts of the principal. Therefore, if Saurabh was acting as an agent of Nisha, she would be liable for his actions. In this case, Nisha asked Saurabh to drive her car, which implies that he was acting as her agent. As a result, Nisha would be liable for any damage caused by Saurabh's negligent driving.
CONCLUSION: In this case, Nisha would be liable for the injuries suffered by Srikant due to the negligent driving of Saurabh, as he was acting as her agent when he was driving the car. Therefore, Nisha would be responsible for compensating Srikant for the injuries suffered by him.
ISSUE: Whether Nisha is liable for the injuries suffered by Srikant due to the negligent driving of Saurabh?
ANALYSIS: The principle of "qui facit per alium facit per se" means that the acts of an agent are considered to be the acts of the principal. Therefore, if Saurabh was acting as an agent of Nisha, she would be liable for his actions. In this case, Nisha asked Saurabh to drive her car, which implies that he was acting as her agent. As a result, Nisha would be liable for any damage caused by Saurabh's negligent driving.
CONCLUSION: In this case, Nisha would be liable for the injuries suffered by Srikant due to the negligent driving of Saurabh, as he was acting as her agent when he was driving the car. Therefore, Nisha would be responsible for compensating Srikant for the injuries suffered by him.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.FACTS: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh’s negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.a)Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabhb)Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the carc)Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.d)Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accidentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup