Question Description
Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Instruction to Candidates: This section consists of ten problems (with 45 questions) in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.In answering the following questions, you should not rely on any rule(s) except the rule(s) that are supplied for every problem. Further, you should not assume any fact other than those stated in the problem. The aim is to test your ability to properly apply a rule to a given set of facts, even when the result is absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the aim to test any knowledge of law you may already possess.Problem 1 (For question)Rules :A. The fundamental right to freedom of association includes the right to form an association as well as not join an association.B. The fundamental right to freedom of association also includes the freedom to decide with whom toassociate.C. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not extend to the right to realize the objectives of forming the association.D. Fundamental rights are applicable only to laws made by or administrative actions of the State and do not apply to actions of private persons.E. Any law in contravention of fundamental rights is unconstitutional and therefore cannot bind anyperson.FactsGajodhar Pharmaceuticals, a private company, offered an employment contract of two years to Syed Monirul Alam. One of the clauses in the employment contract provided that Syed Monirul Alam must join Gajodhar Mazdoor Singh (GMS), one of the trade unions active in Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals.Q. Decide which of the following propositions can be most reasonably inferred through the application of the stated legal rules to the facts of this case:a)The employment contract offered to Monirul Alam to join GMS is legal as it does not restrict hisfreedom not to join any association.b)The condition requiring Monirul Alam to join GMS cannot bind him as it impinges on his freedom not to join any association.c)Syed Monirul Alam cannot claim a fundamental right to freedom of association against Gajodhar Pharmaceuticals and therefore, the contract would bind him even though his freedom of association is restricted.d)The employment contract infringes Syed Monirul Alam’s freedom to decide with whom to associate and therefore is legally not enforceable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.