UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Which among the following could be said to be... Start Learning for Free
Which among the following could be said to be an 'Open Economy'?

  • a)
    A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economics

  • b)
    A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assets

  • c)
    An economy that operates without government intervention

  • d)
    None of the above

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nati...
An open economy refers to a country that engages in international trade, including the exchange of goods, services, and financial assets with other nations. This type of economy is characterized by its openness to global markets and competition, allowing for the movement of resources, products, and investments across borders. In an open economy, businesses and individuals can import and export goods and services, invest in foreign markets, and borrow or lend capital with other countries.



Option 1, which refers to free-market and laissez-faire economics, describes an economic system with minimal government intervention, but it does not necessarily imply that the economy is open to international trade. Option 3, an economy without government intervention, is also not necessarily an open economy, as it does not directly address international trade.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nati...
Open Economy:
An open economy is a type of economy that engages in international trade and economic transactions with other nations. It allows the free movement of goods, services, and capital across its borders. In an open economy, the country's economic activities are not restricted to domestic markets but expand to the global market.

Explanation of the options:
a) A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economics: While a nation that follows free-market and laissez-faire economics promotes economic freedom and limited government intervention, it does not necessarily imply that the country is engaged in international trade or has an open economy. Therefore, option (a) is not the correct answer.

b) A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assets: This option accurately describes an open economy. When a country engages in international trade, both in terms of goods and services as well as financial assets like stocks, bonds, and currencies, it indicates the integration of the country's economy with the global economy. This openness allows for the exchange of resources, ideas, and opportunities, leading to economic growth and development. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.

c) An economy that operates without government intervention: While an economy operating without government intervention may promote economic freedom and a free market system, it does not necessarily mean that the country is engaged in international trade. Government intervention can vary across economies, and even in an economy with limited government intervention, international trade could still be restricted. Therefore, option (c) is not the correct answer.

Therefore, the correct answer is option (b) - a nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assets.
Free Test
Community Answer
Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nati...
Any nation of is good for their exports services like good services etc that means country gain a good economic strength +good relation and bonding to other country+mutual balancing and helpful relation such as America and india
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.The author of the passage tends to support which of the following statements?I. People are not just numbers nor merely resources for economy. II. The 3 P slogan of People, Planets and Profit. III. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work not investments of money.IV. Free market capitalism. Select the right answer using the code below

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.As per the above passage what were not the consequences of 2008 global financial crisis?I. Bailing out ‘too large to fail’ institutions by governments.II. Millions of common citizens who lost homes and livelihoods were compensated.III. Neo-liberal economics continued to prevail.IV. Global financial systems became fair. Select the correct answer giving the code below.

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.The ‘invisible hand’ mentioned in the above passage does not support which of the following?

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.The wake up call given in the club of Rome in 1972 warns of which of the following issues in the above passage?I. Size of the economy measured in money terms alone.II. Ease of doing business and GDP growth is the focus.III. “Thatcher – Reagan – Chicago” model of economics.IV. Minimum governance and unbridled private enterprise. Select the right answer using the code below

Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which among the following could be said to be an Open Economy?a)A nation that follows the doctrine of Free-market and Laissez-faire economicsb)A nation that trades with other nations in goods and services and financial assetsc)An economy that operates without government interventiond)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev