GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the crimi...
Start Learning for Free
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.
Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.
Which of the following best describes Dylan's response to Alan?
Which of the following best describes Dylan's response to Alan?
- a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different country
- b)Dylan partially agrees with Alan's reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the government
- c)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universally
- d)Dylan challenges Alan's reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are not
- e)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogy
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted o...
Step 1: Analyzing the Argument
Alan’s argument is that the government should take steps to reduce poverty in an effort to reduce all kinds of crime from petty theft to terrorism.
Alan’s argument is that the government should take steps to reduce poverty in an effort to reduce all kinds of crime from petty theft to terrorism.
Dylan quotes a study in another country that showed that the motives behind theft and terrorism are not the same and that tackling one need not tackle the other.
Essentially, Dylan agrees with one part of Alan’s argument (that financial reasons motivate theft), disagrees with another part (terrorism is not motivated by financial factors but rather political or religious factors) and hence believes that the recommendation made by Alan to the government would not be effective.
Step 2: Eliminating Options
Option (A) can be eliminated because Dylan is not entirely changing the direction of the conversation. Even if the study he quotes is about another country, he is still focusing on the factors that motivate crime.
Option (C) can be eliminated because Dylan is not broadening but questioning Alan’s argument. For (C) to be true, Dylan must be saying something along the lines that the conclusion that Alan has drawn apply universally to all countries.
Option (E) can also be eliminated. The two are arriving at different conclusions but (E) claims that they are arriving at the same conclusion.
At first glance, both options (B) and (D) look like they are representing Dylan’s reasoning. However, Dylan is not refuting Alan’s recommendation itself but the effectiveness of the recommendation – He is not saying the government must not alleviate poverty but rather than alleviating poverty will not necessarily curb terrorism. Option (B) can therefore, be eliminated.
Option (D) works because Alan is assuming that what is true for theft is true for terrorism and Dylan is pointing out that it need not be the case.
Option D is the correct answer.
Option (A) can be eliminated because Dylan is not entirely changing the direction of the conversation. Even if the study he quotes is about another country, he is still focusing on the factors that motivate crime.
Option (C) can be eliminated because Dylan is not broadening but questioning Alan’s argument. For (C) to be true, Dylan must be saying something along the lines that the conclusion that Alan has drawn apply universally to all countries.
Option (E) can also be eliminated. The two are arriving at different conclusions but (E) claims that they are arriving at the same conclusion.
At first glance, both options (B) and (D) look like they are representing Dylan’s reasoning. However, Dylan is not refuting Alan’s recommendation itself but the effectiveness of the recommendation – He is not saying the government must not alleviate poverty but rather than alleviating poverty will not necessarily curb terrorism. Option (B) can therefore, be eliminated.
Option (D) works because Alan is assuming that what is true for theft is true for terrorism and Dylan is pointing out that it need not be the case.
Option D is the correct answer.
Most Upvoted Answer
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted o...
Response:
Explanation:
- Challenges Alans reasoning: Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by pointing out that in a study conducted in a country known for producing terrorists, the terrorists were better educated and not necessarily from lower income classes. This directly contradicts Alans assertion that increasing funding to education and reducing poverty would reduce the threat of terrorism.
- Explains the difference between theft and terrorism: Dylan explains that crimes like theft are typically committed for personal gain, whereas terrorism is driven by political or religious motives. This difference in motivation undermines Alans argument that reducing poverty and increasing education funding would also reduce the threat of terrorism.
- Highlights the flaw in Alans analogy: By providing a specific example that contradicts Alans generalization, Dylan challenges the validity of the causal relationship Alan draws between poverty, education, and crime rates. Dylan's response suggests that the factors influencing terrorism are more complex and cannot be addressed simply by addressing poverty and education.
In summary, Dylan's response effectively challenges Alans reasoning by providing a different perspective on the relationship between education, income, and crime rates, particularly in the context of terrorism.
Explanation:
- Challenges Alans reasoning: Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by pointing out that in a study conducted in a country known for producing terrorists, the terrorists were better educated and not necessarily from lower income classes. This directly contradicts Alans assertion that increasing funding to education and reducing poverty would reduce the threat of terrorism.
- Explains the difference between theft and terrorism: Dylan explains that crimes like theft are typically committed for personal gain, whereas terrorism is driven by political or religious motives. This difference in motivation undermines Alans argument that reducing poverty and increasing education funding would also reduce the threat of terrorism.
- Highlights the flaw in Alans analogy: By providing a specific example that contradicts Alans generalization, Dylan challenges the validity of the causal relationship Alan draws between poverty, education, and crime rates. Dylan's response suggests that the factors influencing terrorism are more complex and cannot be addressed simply by addressing poverty and education.
In summary, Dylan's response effectively challenges Alans reasoning by providing a different perspective on the relationship between education, income, and crime rates, particularly in the context of terrorism.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Alan: In the last 15 years, most of the criminals who were convicted of theft or murder were from the lower income classes and had not completed high school. Therefore, the government has to spend more money on reducing poverty and increase funding to education. Because terrorism is the most severe of all crimes, such measures would bring down overall crime rate and reduce threat from terrorism.Dylan: A study that was conducted in a country known to produce a number of terrorists showed that on average the terrorists were better educated than the overall population and that they did not necessarily come from lower income classes. This is probably because crimes such as theft are committed for personal gain while terrorism is for political or religious gain.Which of the following best describes Dylans response to Alan?a)Dylan changes the direction of the argument entirely by discussing the scenario in a different countryb)Dylan partially agrees with Alans reasoning but refutes his recommendation to the governmentc)Dylan converts a causal argument made by Alan into a generalization applicable universallyd)Dylan challenges Alans reasoning by explaining why two situations that Alan perceives as similar are note)While Alan arrives at a conclusion by drawing an analogy, Dylan arrives at the same conclusion by refuting the analogyCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup