GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > There are several scientific studies and rese...
Start Learning for Free
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.
Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?
- a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.
- b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.
- c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.
- d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.
- e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are co...
Step 1: Analyzing the Argument
The author believes that scientific studies, when done right, are reliable and that the conflicting studies are the result of misrepresentation of data and inaccurate studies and not the problem with the scientific methodology itself.
The author believes that scientific studies, when done right, are reliable and that the conflicting studies are the result of misrepresentation of data and inaccurate studies and not the problem with the scientific methodology itself.
To further underscore the reasoning, the correct option must establish one more situation in which the methodology adopted in the study is inaccurate and/or the news media misrepresents the actual results of the study.
Step 2: Eliminating Options
Option (A) presents a study result that has a conclusion that is seemingly wrong. However, there is nothing in the answer option that indicates that the study adopted inaccurate methodology. The answer might seem attractive because the information is contrary to real life information. However, real life information should not be brought into any critical reasoning question. The option can be eliminated.
Option (C) presents a study that further collaborates another study – there is no conflict and no sign of any inaccuracy in this option.
While Option (D) mentions that the news media made a study into a sensation, there is again nothing to indicate that the study was misrepresented or that the study involved incorrect methodology.
Option (E) indicates a seeming conflict in beliefs held by people. Again however, there is nothing to indicate that either of those studies are incorrect. There need not a conflict either, because the disease could be affected by both genetic and lifestyle factors.
Option(B) collaborates the author’s argument the best because it indicates that the study was done on a very small population and that the study, despite being unverified, is becoming popular. This extends the discussion in the argument and is the answer.
Option B is the correct answer.
Option (A) presents a study result that has a conclusion that is seemingly wrong. However, there is nothing in the answer option that indicates that the study adopted inaccurate methodology. The answer might seem attractive because the information is contrary to real life information. However, real life information should not be brought into any critical reasoning question. The option can be eliminated.
Option (C) presents a study that further collaborates another study – there is no conflict and no sign of any inaccuracy in this option.
While Option (D) mentions that the news media made a study into a sensation, there is again nothing to indicate that the study was misrepresented or that the study involved incorrect methodology.
Option (E) indicates a seeming conflict in beliefs held by people. Again however, there is nothing to indicate that either of those studies are incorrect. There need not a conflict either, because the disease could be affected by both genetic and lifestyle factors.
Option(B) collaborates the author’s argument the best because it indicates that the study was done on a very small population and that the study, despite being unverified, is becoming popular. This extends the discussion in the argument and is the answer.
Option B is the correct answer.
Most Upvoted Answer
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are co...
Explanation:
Unverified study on red wine reducing cancer risk
An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group further corroborates the author's argument. This example highlights how misleading or unverified studies can be picked up by the media and spread as scientific fact, leading to confusion and misinformation among the public.
This scenario aligns with the author's argument that inconsistencies in scientific studies are often due to inaccuracies in methodology or misrepresentation by the media. In this case, the study's small sample size and lack of verification make its findings unreliable, yet it may still be portrayed as a significant scientific breakthrough.
By showcasing how easily misinformation can be disseminated through the news media, this example strengthens the author's assertion that the public's perception of conflicting scientific information is often influenced by flawed studies or misrepresented results.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice There are several scientific studies and research findings that are constantly discussed and publicized in the news media. Some of these are contrary to other research studies that are published. This conflict in information makes people believe that either science is inaccurate or that they can ‘choose’ which scientific result they want to believe in. However, neither of these beliefs is accurate. Science is not inaccurate or subjective. Most of the time, scientific studies show inconsistent results either because of inaccuracies in methodology adopted or because of misrepresentation of actual results by the news media. For example, a recent study done on just 15 women showed that eating chocolate was not necessarily harmful during pregnancy and the media reported that chocolate was actually beneficial to the foetus.Which of the following best further corroborate the author’s argument?a)A study result that shows that the effect of automobile pollution on global warming is marginal.b)An unverified study gaining popularity because it seemingly showed that red wine reduces the risk of cancer on a very small control group.c)A new study that further collaborates an earlier finding that the consumption of some types of berries lower the risk of heart failure.d)The news media highlighting the fact that a study had clearly proven that effects of certain drugs on rats need not be the same as on humans.e)People not knowing what to believe because one study shows that a certain disease is caused by genetic factors, while another shows that it also caused by lifestyle factors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup