GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Industrial and automobile pollution have long...
Start Learning for Free
Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.
Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?
- a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogy
- b)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to it
- c)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theory
- d)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thought
- e)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an example
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribu...
Step 1: Analyzing the Argument
The argument discusses the various factors that cause global warming. The author refutes the popular belief that industrial and automobile pollution are the primary factors and presents an alternative theory that cattle belching has a greater impact. Although not explicitly stated, the author implies that cattle farming is a contributor by stating that beef consumption contributes to global warming. The correct answer must capture this reasoning used by the author.
The argument discusses the various factors that cause global warming. The author refutes the popular belief that industrial and automobile pollution are the primary factors and presents an alternative theory that cattle belching has a greater impact. Although not explicitly stated, the author implies that cattle farming is a contributor by stating that beef consumption contributes to global warming. The correct answer must capture this reasoning used by the author.
Step 2: Eliminating Options
An analogy is a comparison. For the author to draw an analogy, he should be saying that what happened in the case of X is true again in the case of Y. However, the author does not make any such comparison and option (A) can be eliminated.
The author has presented a counter theory made by some researchers. The author has also presented a hypothetical scenario explaining the counter theory. However, at no point has the author provided any “evidence”. An evidence has to be some kind of data or irrefutable fact used by the author. Since the argument presents no evidence, option (B) can be eliminated.
While the author does present a theory that is contrary to another, the theory presented is not the author’s own but that of the researchers. The option that correctly describes the author’s reasoning must take into account the last statement of the argument, which is the primary statement that presents the author’s perspective. However, option (C) fails to capture this.
The example provided by the author is not done with the objective of comparing two theories but with the objective of justifying one. Option (E) can be eliminated.
The author is providing an illustration of the new theory in an effort to counter the long-established one. Choice (D) is an apt description of the argument.
Option D is the correct answer.
An analogy is a comparison. For the author to draw an analogy, he should be saying that what happened in the case of X is true again in the case of Y. However, the author does not make any such comparison and option (A) can be eliminated.
The author has presented a counter theory made by some researchers. The author has also presented a hypothetical scenario explaining the counter theory. However, at no point has the author provided any “evidence”. An evidence has to be some kind of data or irrefutable fact used by the author. Since the argument presents no evidence, option (B) can be eliminated.
While the author does present a theory that is contrary to another, the theory presented is not the author’s own but that of the researchers. The option that correctly describes the author’s reasoning must take into account the last statement of the argument, which is the primary statement that presents the author’s perspective. However, option (C) fails to capture this.
The example provided by the author is not done with the objective of comparing two theories but with the objective of justifying one. Option (E) can be eliminated.
The author is providing an illustration of the new theory in an effort to counter the long-established one. Choice (D) is an apt description of the argument.
Option D is the correct answer.
Most Upvoted Answer
Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribu...
Author's Reasoning Explanation:
The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thought.
Explanation:
- The author introduces the idea that methane emitted by cud-chewing animals is more potent than carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide from industrial and automobile pollution.
- By highlighting the impact of methane from cows, the author challenges the traditional belief that industrial and automobile pollution are the main contributors to global warming.
- The comparison between the environmental impact of driving a hybrid electric car and consuming beef serves as an illustration to support the new school of thought regarding methane emissions from cows.
- The author's reasoning is based on presenting a different perspective that contradicts the popular notion about the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions.
The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thought.
Explanation:
- The author introduces the idea that methane emitted by cud-chewing animals is more potent than carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide from industrial and automobile pollution.
- By highlighting the impact of methane from cows, the author challenges the traditional belief that industrial and automobile pollution are the main contributors to global warming.
- The comparison between the environmental impact of driving a hybrid electric car and consuming beef serves as an illustration to support the new school of thought regarding methane emissions from cows.
- The author's reasoning is based on presenting a different perspective that contradicts the popular notion about the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Industrial and automobile pollution have long been thought to contribute to global warming. However, researchers have identified that the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide released into the atmosphere are not as potent as the methane emitted by cud-chewing animals such as cows when they fart or belch. Therefore, if you drive a hybrid electric car to the grocery, any favor that you would do to the environment would be offset if you end up buying beef.Which of the following best describes the author's reasoning?a)The author establishes a point by drawing an analogyb)The author disproves a popular notion by providing evidence that is contrary to itc)The author presents a new theory in response to an existing well-established theoryd)The author uses an illustration to support a new school of thought that is contrary to a popular school of thoughte)The author makes a comparison between two theories by providing an exampleCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup