GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > The average life expectancy for the United St...
Start Learning for Free
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?
Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?
- a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.
- b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.
- c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.
- d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.
- e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whol...
If B is true, the greater abundance of longevity-promoting environmental factors it mentions is probably at least partly responsible for the higher life expectancy in Hawaii. Children born in Hawaii benefit from these factors from birth, and thus Louisianans who have children in Hawaii increase their children's chances of living longer. Therefore, B is the best answer. If life expectancy in Hawaii is likely to be falling, as A says, the argument is weakened rather than strengthened. C and E, in the absence of other relevant information, have no bearing on the conclusion; thus, they are inappropriate. D is irrelevant, because the information it mentions about rates would already have been incorporated into the statistics cited in the passage.
Most Upvoted Answer
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whol...
Statement B would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage because it provides a reason for the difference in life expectancy between Hawaii and Louisiana. If environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana, it is reasonable to conclude that a family from Louisiana would see an increase in life expectancy for their children if they moved to Hawaii.
Breaking down the answer into headings and HTML bullet points:
Explanation: Statement B provides a reason for the difference in life expectancy between Hawaii and Louisiana.
Reasoning: Environmental factors can have a significant impact on life expectancy, and if these factors are more abundant in Hawaii, it would make sense that people born there would live longer on average.
Evidence: The passage states that children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, which is higher than the average life expectancy for the US population as a whole. This suggests that there may be environmental factors in Hawaii that contribute to this higher life expectancy.
Impact: If statement B is true, it would provide strong support for the idea that a family from Louisiana could increase their children's life expectancy by moving to Hawaii. This would strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage.
Therefore, statement B is the correct answer.
Breaking down the answer into headings and HTML bullet points:
Explanation: Statement B provides a reason for the difference in life expectancy between Hawaii and Louisiana.
Reasoning: Environmental factors can have a significant impact on life expectancy, and if these factors are more abundant in Hawaii, it would make sense that people born there would live longer on average.
Evidence: The passage states that children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, which is higher than the average life expectancy for the US population as a whole. This suggests that there may be environmental factors in Hawaii that contribute to this higher life expectancy.
Impact: If statement B is true, it would provide strong support for the idea that a family from Louisiana could increase their children's life expectancy by moving to Hawaii. This would strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage.
Therefore, statement B is the correct answer.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whol...
According to me, Life expectancy is not singular in nature.
it depends on multiple factors like..
1)Macro factorss like
Access to health care, Routine checkups, Food availability, Work, Crime rate, Culture , employment rate , Education e.t.c.
2)Micro factors like
Lifestyle, Daily exercise, Gender, Diet, sex, genetics, stress, hygiene e.t.c
and many more other factors
Mostly the choices and decision made by the people
Also,
i have read somewhere that Hawaiian culture is native and more close to nature compared to Louisiana where it is a mix of multiple culture. This is something i think is important when it comes to raising a child.
Human beings adapt to the environment they grow in...
What i mean to say is..
If the Couple is moving to Hawaii then the child is more likely to be healthy because of the ethnics and Nature
but he is more likely to get less exposure of the other culture (not necessarily) where as in Louisiana the child will get to experience different culture.
Air Quality Index is Significantly better in Hawaii because of the nature the place possess
and many other Environmental factor like
Sexual activities
Socio-professional lifestyle
Food (quantitative and qualitative)
Stress
Prenatal and postnatal environment
isolation
education
and more..
Its not like Hawaii is better than Louisiana
both of them have their one Boon's and Con's.
This is my explanation.
Thank you.
it depends on multiple factors like..
1)Macro factorss like
Access to health care, Routine checkups, Food availability, Work, Crime rate, Culture , employment rate , Education e.t.c.
2)Micro factors like
Lifestyle, Daily exercise, Gender, Diet, sex, genetics, stress, hygiene e.t.c
and many more other factors
Mostly the choices and decision made by the people
Also,
i have read somewhere that Hawaiian culture is native and more close to nature compared to Louisiana where it is a mix of multiple culture. This is something i think is important when it comes to raising a child.
Human beings adapt to the environment they grow in...
What i mean to say is..
If the Couple is moving to Hawaii then the child is more likely to be healthy because of the ethnics and Nature
but he is more likely to get less exposure of the other culture (not necessarily) where as in Louisiana the child will get to experience different culture.
Air Quality Index is Significantly better in Hawaii because of the nature the place possess
and many other Environmental factor like
Sexual activities
Socio-professional lifestyle
Food (quantitative and qualitative)
Stress
Prenatal and postnatal environment
isolation
education
and more..
Its not like Hawaii is better than Louisiana
both of them have their one Boon's and Con's.
This is my explanation.
Thank you.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup