GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The average life expectancy for the United St... Start Learning for Free
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.
Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?
  • a)
    As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.
  • b)
    Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.
  • c)
    Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.
  • d)
    Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.
  • e)
    Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whol...
If B is true, the greater abundance of longevity-promoting environmental factors it mentions is probably at least partly responsible for the higher life expectancy in Hawaii. Children born in Hawaii benefit from these factors from birth, and thus Louisianans who have children in Hawaii increase their children's chances of living longer. Therefore, B is the best answer. If life expectancy in Hawaii is likely to be falling, as A says, the argument is weakened rather than strengthened. C and E, in the absence of other relevant information, have no bearing on the conclusion; thus, they are inappropriate. D is irrelevant, because the information it mentions about rates would already have been incorporated into the statistics cited in the passage.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whol...
Environmental Factors Favoring Longevity in Hawaii:
- Hawaii has abundant environmental factors that favor longevity, such as a healthier diet, more opportunities for outdoor activities, and a generally lower-stress lifestyle compared to Louisiana.

Impact on Life Expectancy:
- These environmental factors contribute to the higher life expectancy in Hawaii, which is reflected in the average life expectancy of 77 years for individuals born in Hawaii.

Strengthening the Conclusion:
- If it is true that environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana, it significantly strengthens the conclusion that children born in Hawaii are expected to live longer than those born in Louisiana.
- This information provides a clear explanation for why moving from Louisiana to Hawaii would likely result in longer life expectancy for the newlywed couple's children.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Top Courses for GMAT

The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana. Q. Which of the following statements, if true, would most significantly strengthen the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)As population density increases in Hawaii, life expectancy figures for that state are likely to be revised downward.b)Environmental factors tending to favor longevity are abundant in Hawaii and less numerous in Louisiana.c)Twenty-five percent of all Louisianans who move to Hawaii live longer than 77 years.d)Over the last decade, average life expectancy has risen at a higher rate for Louisianans than for Hawaiians.e)Studies show that the average life expectancy for Hawaiians who move permanently to Louisiana is roughly equal to that of Hawaiians who remain in Hawaii.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev