GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > The average life expectancy for the United St...
Start Learning for Free
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.
Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?
Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?
- a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianan's life.
- b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.
- c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaii's current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.
- d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.
- e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whol...
This choice suggests that a significant proportion of Hawaii's population is genetically predisposed to be long lived. Since Louisianans are not necessarily so predisposed, and since the Louisianans' children will acquire their genetic characteristics from their parents, not from their birthplace, this choice presents a reason to doubt that Hawaiian born children of native Louisianans will have an increased life expectancy. Therefore, this choice is the best answer. Because the conclusion concerns people born in Hawaii, not the average Louisianan, A does not weaken the conclusion. Because the governor's allegation is false, it cannot affect the conclusion. D fails to weaken the conclusion because it is consistent with the information given and the conclusion about life expectancy. By suggesting that Hawaii's environment is in one respect particularly healthy, E supports the conclusion.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whol...
Understanding the Conclusion
The passage concludes that a couple from Louisiana, starting their family in Hawaii, will have children with longer life expectancies than if they remained in Louisiana. This conclusion is based on the average life expectancies of Hawaii and Louisiana.
Weakening the Conclusion
To weaken this conclusion, we need to introduce information that questions the assumption that moving to Hawaii will lead to increased life expectancy for the couple's children.
Option C: Genetic Factors
- Option C states that the longevity attributed to Hawaii’s current population is primarily due to genetically determined factors.
- This implies that the higher life expectancy in Hawaii may not be fully accessible to children born to parents from Louisiana. If genetics play a significant role in determining life expectancy, the couple's children may not benefit as expected simply from being born in Hawaii.
Impact of Option C
- If genetics are a major contributor to life expectancy, then the children of the Louisiana couple may have a life expectancy closer to that of Louisiana, regardless of their Hawaiian birthplace.
- This would challenge the conclusion that relocating to Hawaii guarantees longer life for their children, as it suggests that environmental factors alone may not be sufficient to alter genetic predispositions.
Conclusion
In summary, option C most seriously weakens the conclusion by introducing the idea that genetic factors could limit the benefits of moving to Hawaii, thereby questioning the assumption that the location alone will enhance life expectancy.
The passage concludes that a couple from Louisiana, starting their family in Hawaii, will have children with longer life expectancies than if they remained in Louisiana. This conclusion is based on the average life expectancies of Hawaii and Louisiana.
Weakening the Conclusion
To weaken this conclusion, we need to introduce information that questions the assumption that moving to Hawaii will lead to increased life expectancy for the couple's children.
Option C: Genetic Factors
- Option C states that the longevity attributed to Hawaii’s current population is primarily due to genetically determined factors.
- This implies that the higher life expectancy in Hawaii may not be fully accessible to children born to parents from Louisiana. If genetics play a significant role in determining life expectancy, the couple's children may not benefit as expected simply from being born in Hawaii.
Impact of Option C
- If genetics are a major contributor to life expectancy, then the children of the Louisiana couple may have a life expectancy closer to that of Louisiana, regardless of their Hawaiian birthplace.
- This would challenge the conclusion that relocating to Hawaii guarantees longer life for their children, as it suggests that environmental factors alone may not be sufficient to alter genetic predispositions.
Conclusion
In summary, option C most seriously weakens the conclusion by introducing the idea that genetic factors could limit the benefits of moving to Hawaii, thereby questioning the assumption that the location alone will enhance life expectancy.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The average life expectancy for the United States population as a whole is 73.9 years, but children born in Hawaii will live an average of 77 years, and those born in Louisiana, 71.7 years. If a newlywed couple from Louisiana were to begin their family in Hawaii, therefore, their children would be expected to live longer than would be the case if the family remained in Louisiana.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?a)Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to Hawaii will significantly lengthen the average Louisianans life.b)The governor of Louisiana has falsely alleged that statistics for his state are inaccurate.c)The longevity ascribed to Hawaiis current population is attributable mostly to genetically determined factors.d)Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years.e)Most of the Hawaiian Islands have levels of air pollution well below the national average for the United States.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup