Question Description
When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic — ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The EC's measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied withQ.According to the passage, which of the following directions were given by the Supreme Court?1.EVMs should have Braille buttons for the visually impaired voters2.All the voting sites should have ramps3.Information regarding political parties and candidates should be made accessible to the persons withdisabilities4.Differently abled persons are allowed to take a companion when they cast their ballota)1 and 2 onlyb)1, 2 and 4 onlyc)1, 3 and 4 onlyd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.