Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Many police officers arrest African-Americans...

Join the Discussion on the App

Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.

a)
not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime
b)
although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crime
c)
not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crime
d)
not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crime
e)
not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areas

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Sentence Correction- 4

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significa...

This is a question of parallel structure. Because you have ‘but because’ not underlined, you need a parallel form using the word because. The correct idiom not because x, but because y appears in two answers: D and E. Now you have to go to the second mistake in parallel structure. Not because they are x, but because they are y. Choice E does not have this structure. Choice D is the correct answer.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Over the past 50 years, expansive, low-density communities have proliferated at the edges of many cities in the United States and Canada, creating a phenomenon known as suburban sprawl. Andres (5) Duany, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck, a group of prominent town planners belonging to a movement called New Urbanism, contend that suburban sprawl contributes to the decline of civic life and civility. For reasons involving the flow of (10) automobile traffic, they note, zoning laws usually dictate that suburban homes, stores, businesses, and schools be built in separate areas, and this separation robs people of communal space where they can interact and get to know one another. It is as difficult (15) to imagine the concept of community without a town square or local pub, these town planners contend, as it is to imagine the concept of family independent of the home.Suburban housing subdivisions, Duany and his (20) colleagues add, usually contain homes identical not only in appearance but also in price, resulting in a de facto economic segregation of residential neighborhoods. Children growing up in these neighborhoods, whatever their economic (25) circumstances, are certain to be ill prepared for life in a diverse society. Moreover, because the widely separated suburban homes and businesses are connected only by “collector roads,” residents are forced to drive, often in heavy traffic, in order to (30) perform many daily tasks. Time that would in a town center involve social interaction within a physical public realm is now spent inside the automobile, where people cease to be community members and instead become motorists, competing for road space, (35) often acting antisocially. Pedestrians rarely act in this manner toward each other. Duany and his colleagues advocate development based on early-twentieth- century urban neighborhoods that mix housing of different prices and offer residents a “gratifying (40) public realm” that includes narrow, tree-lined streets, parks, corner grocery stores, cafes, small neighborhood schools, all within walking distance. This, they believe, would give people of diverse backgrounds and lifestyles an opportunity to interact (45) and thus develop mutual respect.Opponents of New Urbanism claim that migration to sprawling suburbs is an expression of people’s legitimate desire to secure the enjoyment and personal mobility provided by the automobile and the (50) lifestyle that it makes possible. However, the New Urbanists do not question people’s right to their own values; instead, they suggest that we should take a more critical view of these values and of the sprawl conducive zoning and subdivision policies that reflect (55) them. New Urbanists are fundamentally concerned with the long-term social costs of the now-prevailing attitude that individual mobility, consumption, and wealth should be valued absolutely, regardless of their impact on community life.Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the position that the passage attributes to critics of the New Urbanists?

View answer

Over the past 50 years, expansive, low-density communities have proliferated at the edges of many cities in the United States and Canada, creating a phenomenon known as suburban sprawl. Andres (5) Duany, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck, a group of prominent town planners belonging to a movement called New Urbanism, contend that suburban sprawl contributes to the decline of civic life and civility. For reasons involving the flow of (10) automobile traffic, they note, zoning laws usually dictate that suburban homes, stores, businesses, and schools be built in separate areas, and this separation robs people of communal space where they can interact and get to know one another. It is as difficult (15) to imagine the concept of community without a town square or local pub, these town planners contend, as it is to imagine the concept of family independent of the home.Suburban housing subdivisions, Duany and his (20) colleagues add, usually contain homes identical not only in appearance but also in price, resulting in a de facto economic segregation of residential neighborhoods. Children growing up in these neighborhoods, whatever their economic (25) circumstances, are certain to be ill prepared for life in a diverse society. Moreover, because the widely separated suburban homes and businesses are connected only by “collector roads,” residents are forced to drive, often in heavy traffic, in order to (30) perform many daily tasks. Time that would in a town center involve social interaction within a physical public realm is now spent inside the automobile, where people cease to be community members and instead become motorists, competing for road space, (35) often acting antisocially. Pedestrians rarely act in this manner toward each other. Duany and his colleagues advocate development based on early-twentieth- century urban neighborhoods that mix housing of different prices and offer residents a “gratifying (40) public realm” that includes narrow, tree-lined streets, parks, corner grocery stores, cafes, small neighborhood schools, all within walking distance. This, they believe, would give people of diverse backgrounds and lifestyles an opportunity to interact (45) and thus develop mutual respect.Opponents of New Urbanism claim that migration to sprawling suburbs is an expression of people’s legitimate desire to secure the enjoyment and personal mobility provided by the automobile and the (50) lifestyle that it makes possible. However, the New Urbanists do not question people’s right to their own values; instead, they suggest that we should take a more critical view of these values and of the sprawl conducive zoning and subdivision policies that reflect (55) them. New Urbanists are fundamentally concerned with the long-term social costs of the now-prevailing attitude that individual mobility, consumption, and wealth should be valued absolutely, regardless of their impact on community life.The passage most strongly suggests that which one of the following would occur if new housing subdivisions in suburban communities were built in accordance with the recommendations of Duany and his colleagues?

View answer

Over the past 50 years, expansive, low-density communities have proliferated at the edges of many cities in the United States and Canada, creating a phenomenon known as suburban sprawl. Andres (5) Duany, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck, a group of prominent town planners belonging to a movement called New Urbanism, contend that suburban sprawl contributes to the decline of civic life and civility. For reasons involving the flow of (10) automobile traffic, they note, zoning laws usually dictate that suburban homes, stores, businesses, and schools be built in separate areas, and this separation robs people of communal space where they can interact and get to know one another. It is as difficult (15) to imagine the concept of community without a town square or local pub, these town planners contend, as it is to imagine the concept of family independent of the home.Suburban housing subdivisions, Duany and his (20) colleagues add, usually contain homes identical not only in appearance but also in price, resulting in a de facto economic segregation of residential neighborhoods. Children growing up in these neighborhoods, whatever their economic (25) circumstances, are certain to be ill prepared for life in a diverse society. Moreover, because the widely separated suburban homes and businesses are connected only by “collector roads,” residents are forced to drive, often in heavy traffic, in order to (30) perform many daily tasks. Time that would in a town center involve social interaction within a physical public realm is now spent inside the automobile, where people cease to be community members and instead become motorists, competing for road space, (35) often acting antisocially. Pedestrians rarely act in this manner toward each other. Duany and his colleagues advocate development based on early-twentieth- century urban neighborhoods that mix housing of different prices and offer residents a “gratifying (40) public realm” that includes narrow, tree-lined streets, parks, corner grocery stores, cafes, small neighborhood schools, all within walking distance. This, they believe, would give people of diverse backgrounds and lifestyles an opportunity to interact (45) and thus develop mutual respect.Opponents of New Urbanism claim that migration to sprawling suburbs is an expression of people’s legitimate desire to secure the enjoyment and personal mobility provided by the automobile and the (50) lifestyle that it makes possible. However, the New Urbanists do not question people’s right to their own values; instead, they suggest that we should take a more critical view of these values and of the sprawl conducive zoning and subdivision policies that reflect (55) them. New Urbanists are fundamentally concerned with the long-term social costs of the now-prevailing attitude that individual mobility, consumption, and wealth should be valued absolutely, regardless of their impact on community life.The second paragraph most strongly supports the inference that the New Urbanists make which one of the following assumptions?

View answer

When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a difference between free African Americans in colonial New York and New Jersey and free African Americans in the colonial South?

View answer

When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society that was divided between master and white servants brought from Europe. In most parts of the South, some of these first African slaves became free either through escape or through emancipation by their owners. It is therefore a misconception that all African Americans in the pre-Civil War South were slaves. Many researchers have also assumed that these free African Americans were the offspring of white slave owners who took advantage of their female slaves. However, these cases represent only a small minority of free African Americans in the South. Most free African Americans were actually the descendants of African American men and white servant women.In fact, despite the efforts of the various colonial legislatures, white servant women continued to bear children by African American fathers through the late seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century.It appears that such births were the primary source of the increase in the free African American population for this period. Over two hundred African American families in Virginia descended from white women. Forty-six families descended from freed slaves, twenty-nine from Indians, and sixteen from white men who married or had children by free African American women. It is likely that the majority of the remaining families descended from white women since they first appear in court records in the mid-eighteenth century, when slaves could not be freed without legislative approval, and there is no record of legislative approval for their emancipations.The history of free African Americans families in colonial New York and New Jersey, by contrast, is quite different from that of free African Americans in the South. Most were descended from slaves freed by the Dutch West India Company between 1644 and 1664 or by individual owners. Researchers have studied these families, especially a group of fourteen families that scholars have traced through at least three generations. None of the fourteen families appears to be descended from a white servant woman and an African American man. However, Lutheran church records from the eighteenth century show that a few such couples had children baptized.Q.The passage suggests which of the following about African American slaves in the late 1700s?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Many police officers arrest African-Americans not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crime but because they are members of an ethnic minority.a)not from their significance as perpetrators of suburban crimeb)although they are not a significant perpetrators of suburban crimec)not in that they are significant as suburban perpetrators of crimed)not because they are significant perpetrators of suburban crimee)not because being significant perpetrators of crime in suburban areasCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam