Describe briefly the opinoin of some of archeologists about harapan so...
Ans.
Through material evidences and use of ingenuity archaeologist have come up with some notion of how harappan societies were :
1. Burial is one of the strategies used by archaeologist. Through studies of burial archaeologist have found out that there are certain differences in the way graves are made: for example some pits are laid with bricks whereas some are not, thus bringning forth the notion of social differences. However, it is still a specualtion.
2. Evidence of luxury goods too are a good indicator that shows how social structures were, for example most of the evidences of luxury goods were found at the larger settlements like, Harappa and Mohenjodaro. Thus it could be possible that social differences were prominent in the larger settlement due to large population.
3. There are Some graves that contain pottery and some ornaments, it has lead archaeologist to believe that these things are indicating a belief in the after life.
4. On the basis of evidences related with different occupations the archaeologists (or archaeo-botanists or archaeo-zoologists) indicate that the people of different occupations or of different socio-economic positions used to live in the Harappan cities.
5. Some archaeologists are of the opinion that Harappan society had no rulers, and that everybody enjoyed equal status. Others feel there were no single ruler but several, that Mohenjodaro had a separate ruler, Harappa another, and so forth, yet others argue that there was a single state, given the similarity in artefacts, the evidence for planned settlements, the standardised ratio of brick size, and the establishment of settlements near sources of raw material. As of now, the last theory seems the most plausible, as it is unlikely that entire communities could have collectively made and implemented such complex decisions.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Humanities/Arts courses
Describe briefly the opinoin of some of archeologists about harapan so...
Opinions of Archaeologists about Harappan Society
The Harappan civilization, also known as the Indus Valley civilization, was one of the most advanced urban civilizations of ancient times. Archaeologists have made several discoveries and conducted extensive research on this civilization, leading to various opinions about the Harappan society. Here are some of the opinions put forward by archaeologists:
1. Urban Planning and Engineering Marvels:
- Archaeologists believe that the Harappan society was characterized by well-organized urban planning and engineering marvels.
- The cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, with their well-laid-out grid pattern streets, advanced drainage systems, and sophisticated water management, suggest a highly organized society capable of complex engineering.
2. Social Equality and Lack of Monuments:
- Unlike other ancient civilizations, such as the Egyptians and Mesopotamians, the Harappans did not leave behind grand monuments or evidence of powerful rulers.
- Some archaeologists argue that this absence of monumental architecture indicates a society without a centralized authority or significant social hierarchy.
- They believe that the Harappan society was more egalitarian, with a focus on communal living and shared resources.
3. Trade and Economic Prosperity:
- The Harappan civilization flourished due to its extensive trade networks, evidenced by the discovery of seals and artifacts from distant regions.
- Archaeologists suggest that the Harappans had a well-developed economy based on agriculture, trade, and craftsmanship.
- The presence of standardized weights and measures, along with the uniformity of Harappan artifacts across different sites, indicates a sophisticated economic system.
4. Decline and Disappearance:
- One of the greatest mysteries surrounding the Harappan society is its decline and eventual disappearance around 1900 BCE.
- Archaeologists have proposed various theories to explain this decline, including natural disasters, climate change, invasion, or internal social, political, or economic factors.
- Some researchers believe that a combination of factors, such as a decline in rainfall patterns and environmental degradation, may have led to the collapse of the civilization.
In conclusion, the opinions of archaeologists about the Harappan society highlight its urban planning and engineering feats, social equality, economic prosperity, as well as the enigmatic decline and disappearance. Further research and ongoing archaeological excavations continue to shed light on this ancient civilization, adding to our understanding of the Harappan society and its significance in human history.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Humanities/Arts study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Humanities/Arts.