Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: The following questions consist of...

Join the Discussion on the App

a)
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
b)
Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
c)
A is true but R is false
d)
A is false but R is true

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

CLAT Mock Test - 14

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labe...

Coalition Politics has failed to strengthen Indian Federalism.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Federalism in India reminds one of the grinning Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland. At one point the cat disappears and all that remains is the grin, an enigmatic trace of doubtful significance. Federalism is such a vanishing act. The truth, however, is that there never has been a serious principled constituency for federalism in India.Four things sustain federalism. But, in retrospect, they turned out to be very contingent political foundations for federalism. The first was a genuine concern about whether a centralised state could accommodate India’s linguistic and cultural diversity. The States Reorganisation Act and the compromises on the issue of languages was a victory for federalism. It allowed India to use federalism to accommodate linguistic diversity.The second underpinning of federalism is actual distribution of political power. The rise of coalition governments, economic liberalisation, regional parties, seemed to provide propitious ground for political federalism. But one must not overestimate the commitment to federalism in that period of fragmentation. Political federalism is quite compatible with financial, and administrative centralisation. But what fragmentation of power effectively meant was that each state could bargain for certain things; or very strong leaders could veto central proposals.The third thing that sustains federalism is the political and institutional culture. But the culture of political parties ruling at the Centre was committed to the most extreme interpretation of flexible federalism, including procedural impropriety to oust opponents. Because of the increasing presidentialisation of national politics, a single-party dominance with powerful messaging power, and change in forms of communication, the attribution of policy successes or failures might change, diminishing the stature of chief ministers considerably. The other source of institutional culture might be the Supreme Court.The fourth thing that sustained federalism was what Louise Tillin has brilliantly analysed as “asymmetrical federalism” — special exemptions given to various states. But asymmetrical federalism has always been subject to three pressures. For Kashmir, asymmetrical federalism came to be seen as the source, not the resolution, of the security threat. Even in the North-east, local conflicts within the scheme of asymmetrical federalism and a discourse of security allowed the Centre to step in.Q. Consider the following statements and choose the best option.I. Presidentialisation of national politics is against the spirit of Indian federalism.II. The concentration of power around political leaders in democratic political systems affect the idea of parliamentary form of government.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Federalism in India reminds one of the grinning Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland. At one point the cat disappears and all that remains is the grin, an enigmatic trace of doubtful significance. Federalism is such a vanishing act. The truth, however, is that there never has been a serious principled constituency for federalism in India.Four things sustain federalism. But, in retrospect, they turned out to be very contingent political foundations for federalism. The first was a genuine concern about whether a centralised state could accommodate India’s linguistic and cultural diversity. The States Reorganisation Act and the compromises on the issue of languages was a victory for federalism. It allowed India to use federalism to accommodate linguistic diversity.The second underpinning of federalism is actual distribution of political power. The rise of coalition governments, economic liberalisation, regional parties, seemed to provide propitious ground for political federalism. But one must not overestimate the commitment to federalism in that period of fragmentation. Political federalism is quite compatible with financial, and administrative centralisation. But what fragmentation of power effectively meant was that each state could bargain for certain things; or very strong leaders could veto central proposals.The third thing that sustains federalism is the political and institutional culture. But the culture of political parties ruling at the Centre was committed to the most extreme interpretation of flexible federalism, including procedural impropriety to oust opponents. Because of the increasing presidentialisation of national politics, a single-party dominance with powerful messaging power, and change in forms of communication, the attribution of policy successes or failures might change, diminishing the stature of chief ministers considerably. The other source of institutional culture might be the Supreme Court.The fourth thing that sustained federalism was what Louise Tillin has brilliantly analysed as “asymmetrical federalism” — special exemptions given to various states. But asymmetrical federalism has always been subject to three pressures. For Kashmir, asymmetrical federalism came to be seen as the source, not the resolution, of the security threat. Even in the North-east, local conflicts within the scheme of asymmetrical federalism and a discourse of security allowed the Centre to step in.Q. Which of the following could be considered the advantage of federalism and decentralization?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Federalism in India reminds one of the grinning Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland. At one point the cat disappears and all that remains is the grin, an enigmatic trace of doubtful significance. Federalism is such a vanishing act. The truth, however, is that there never has been a serious principled constituency for federalism in India.Four things sustain federalism. But, in retrospect, they turned out to be very contingent political foundations for federalism. The first was a genuine concern about whether a centralised state could accommodate India’s linguistic and cultural diversity. The States Reorganisation Act and the compromises on the issue of languages was a victory for federalism. It allowed India to use federalism to accommodate linguistic diversity.The second underpinning of federalism is actual distribution of political power. The rise of coalition governments, economic liberalisation, regional parties, seemed to provide propitious ground for political federalism. But one must not overestimate the commitment to federalism in that period of fragmentation. Political federalism is quite compatible with financial, and administrative centralisation. But what fragmentation of power effectively meant was that each state could bargain for certain things; or very strong leaders could veto central proposals.The third thing that sustains federalism is the political and institutional culture. But the culture of political parties ruling at the Centre was committed to the most extreme interpretation of flexible federalism, including procedural impropriety to oust opponents. Because of the increasing presidentialisation of national politics, a single-party dominance with powerful messaging power, and change in forms of communication, the attribution of policy successes or failures might change, diminishing the stature of chief ministers considerably. The other source of institutional culture might be the Supreme Court.The fourth thing that sustained federalism was what Louise Tillin has brilliantly analysed as “asymmetrical federalism” — special exemptions given to various states. But asymmetrical federalism has always been subject to three pressures. For Kashmir, asymmetrical federalism came to be seen as the source, not the resolution, of the security threat. Even in the North-east, local conflicts within the scheme of asymmetrical federalism and a discourse of security allowed the Centre to step in.Q. Which of the following is not a feature of fragmentation of power under political federalism?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Federalism in India reminds one of the grinning Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland. At one point the cat disappears and all that remains is the grin, an enigmatic trace of doubtful significance. Federalism is such a vanishing act. The truth, however, is that there never has been a serious principled constituency for federalism in India.Four things sustain federalism. But, in retrospect, they turned out to be very contingent political foundations for federalism. The first was a genuine concern about whether a centralised state could accommodate India’s linguistic and cultural diversity. The States Reorganisation Act and the compromises on the issue of languages was a victory for federalism. It allowed India to use federalism to accommodate linguistic diversity.The second underpinning of federalism is actual distribution of political power. The rise of coalition governments, economic liberalisation, regional parties, seemed to provide propitious ground for political federalism. But one must not overestimate the commitment to federalism in that period of fragmentation. Political federalism is quite compatible with financial, and administrative centralisation. But what fragmentation of power effectively meant was that each state could bargain for certain things; or very strong leaders could veto central proposals.The third thing that sustains federalism is the political and institutional culture. But the culture of political parties ruling at the Centre was committed to the most extreme interpretation of flexible federalism, including procedural impropriety to oust opponents. Because of the increasing presidentialisation of national politics, a single-party dominance with powerful messaging power, and change in forms of communication, the attribution of policy successes or failures might change, diminishing the stature of chief ministers considerably. The other source of institutional culture might be the Supreme Court.The fourth thing that sustained federalism was what Louise Tillin has brilliantly analysed as “asymmetrical federalism” — special exemptions given to various states. But asymmetrical federalism has always been subject to three pressures. For Kashmir, asymmetrical federalism came to be seen as the source, not the resolution, of the security threat. Even in the North-east, local conflicts within the scheme of asymmetrical federalism and a discourse of security allowed the Centre to step in.Q. Which of the following is not an example of Assymetrical Federalism with respect to India?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Federalism in India reminds one of the grinning Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland. At one point the cat disappears and all that remains is the grin, an enigmatic trace of doubtful significance. Federalism is such a vanishing act. The truth, however, is that there never has been a serious principled constituency for federalism in India.Four things sustain federalism. But, in retrospect, they turned out to be very contingent political foundations for federalism. The first was a genuine concern about whether a centralised state could accommodate India’s linguistic and cultural diversity. The States Reorganisation Act and the compromises on the issue of languages was a victory for federalism. It allowed India to use federalism to accommodate linguistic diversity.The second underpinning of federalism is actual distribution of political power. The rise of coalition governments, economic liberalisation, regional parties, seemed to provide propitious ground for political federalism. But one must not overestimate the commitment to federalism in that period of fragmentation. Political federalism is quite compatible with financial, and administrative centralisation. But what fragmentation of power effectively meant was that each state could bargain for certain things; or very strong leaders could veto central proposals.The third thing that sustains federalism is the political and institutional culture. But the culture of political parties ruling at the Centre was committed to the most extreme interpretation of flexible federalism, including procedural impropriety to oust opponents. Because of the increasing presidentialisation of national politics, a single-party dominance with powerful messaging power, and change in forms of communication, the attribution of policy successes or failures might change, diminishing the stature of chief ministers considerably. The other source of institutional culture might be the Supreme Court.The fourth thing that sustained federalism was what Louise Tillin has brilliantly analysed as “asymmetrical federalism” — special exemptions given to various states. But asymmetrical federalism has always been subject to three pressures. For Kashmir, asymmetrical federalism came to be seen as the source, not the resolution, of the security threat. Even in the North-east, local conflicts within the scheme of asymmetrical federalism and a discourse of security allowed the Centre to step in.Q. Based on your understanding of the passage, the real success of federalism in India can be attributed to

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The following questions consist of two statements, one labelled as the assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are required to examine these two statements carefully and select the answers to these items using the codes given below.Assertion (A) Coalition politics has failed to strengthen Indian federalism.Reason (R) Regional parties by asserting excessive power did not take full advantage of coalition eraCodesa)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of Ab)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of Ac)A is true but R is falsed)A is false but R is trueCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam