The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > The Constitution of India establishes Parliam...

The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to the

a)
People of India
b)
President
c)
Prime Minister
d)
Legislature

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government...

According to the Provisions of the Constitution of India, the parliamentary form of government established in India, is responsible to the people of India.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government...

The correct answer is option 'A', the responsibility of the parliamentary form of government in India is towards the people of India. Let's understand this in detail:

Introduction:
- The Constitution of India, adopted on 26th November 1949, establishes a parliamentary form of government.
- The parliamentary system of government is a democratic system where the executive branch is accountable to the legislature.

Explanation:
1. Definition of parliamentary form of government:
- In a parliamentary form of government, the executive branch, headed by the Prime Minister, is responsible and accountable to the legislature, which represents the people.
- The members of the executive branch are usually members of the legislature and are elected by the people.
- This form of government emphasizes the principles of collective responsibility, transparency, and accountability.

2. Essence of parliamentary form of government:
- The essence of the parliamentary form of government lies in its responsibility towards the people of India.
- The government is answerable to the people through their elected representatives in the legislature.
- The executive is accountable for its actions, policies, and decisions to the legislature, which in turn represents the aspirations and interests of the people.

3. Responsibility towards the people of India:
- The government is responsible for the welfare and development of the people.
- It is responsible for formulating and implementing policies that promote the overall growth, security, and well-being of the citizens.
- The government is accountable for its actions and decisions, and it must act in the best interests of the people.

4. Role of the President:
- While the President is an important constitutional position in India, the parliamentary form of government gives the President a ceremonial role.
- The President is the head of state, but the real executive power lies with the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers, who are responsible to the legislature and ultimately to the people.

Conclusion:
- The parliamentary form of government in India establishes the responsibility of the government towards the people of India.
- The government is accountable to the legislature, which represents the people's interests and aspirations.
- This form of government ensures transparency, accountability, and the overall welfare of the citizens.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Under our Constitution, the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary all have their own broad spheres of operation.Ordinarily it is not proper for any of these three organs of the State to encroach upon the domain of another, otherwise the delicate balance in the Constitution will be upset, and there will be a reaction. Judges must know their limits and must not try to run the Government. They must have modesty and humility, and not behave like Emperors. There is broad separation of powers under the Constitution and each organ of the State the legislature, the executive and the judiciary must have respect for the others and must not encroach into each other’s domains.The theory of separation of powers first propounded by the French thinker Montesquieu (in his book ‘The Spirit of Laws' broadly holds the field in India too. In chapter XI of his book ‘The Spirit of Laws’ Montesquieu writes:When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, if the judicial power be not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the legislator. Were it joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with violence and oppression.In India, the judiciary occupies an important place. The constitution visualizes an independent judiciary to safeguard the rights of citizens. In a democratic polity, the independent judiciary is a sine qua non to the effective functioning of the system. Administration has to function according to the law and the Constitution. The judiciary has an important role to play in protecting the citizen against the arbitrary exercise of power by administration.In the context of ever-expanding activities of government and discretionary powers vested in the various administrative agencies and public officials, the need to protect and safeguard the citizen's rights assumes significance and priority. In developing societies where the state is playing an important role in development, judiciary has a special responsibility to ensure social justice to the underprivileged sections of the community. However, it must be admitted that the courts cannot interfere in the administrative activities on their own accord even if such activities are arbitrary. They act only when their intervention is sought. Judicial intervention is restrictive in nature and limited in its scope.Q. Suppose the Judiciary has intervened in the questions involving, allotment of a particular bungalow to a Judge, specific bungalows for the Judges pool, monkeys capering in colonies, stray cattle on the streets, will it be safe to say that the Judiciary is disturbing the delicate balance of the Constitution?

View answer

Passage - 3Under our Constitution, the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary all have their own broad spheres of operation. Ordinarily it is not proper for any of these three organs of the State to encroach upon the domain of another, otherwise the delicate balance in the Constitution will be upset, and there will be a reaction. Judges must know their limits and must not try to run the Government. They must have modesty and humility, and not behave like Emperors. There is broad separation of powers under the Constitution and each organ of the State the legislature, the executive and the judiciary must have respect for the others and must not encroach into each other’s domains.The theory of separation of powers first propounded by the French thinker Montesquieu (in his book ‘The Spirit of Laws broadly holds the field in India too. In chapter XI of his book ‘The Spirit of Laws’ Montesquieu writes:When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, if the judicial power be not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the legislator. Were it joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with violence and oppression.In India, the judiciary occupies an important place. The constitution visualizes an independent judiciary to safeguard the rights of citizens. In a democratic polity, the independent judiciary is a sine qua non to the effective functioning of the system. Administration has to function according to the law and the Constitution. The judiciary has an important role to play in protecting the citizen against the arbitrary exercise of power by administration. In the context of ever-expanding activities of government and discretionary powers vested in the various administrative agencies and public officials, the need to protect and safeguard the citizens rights assumes significance and priority. In developing societies where the state is playing an important role in development, judiciary has a special responsibility to ensure social justice to the underprivileged sections of the community. However, it must be admitted that the courts cannot interfere in the administrative activities on their own accord even if such activities are arbitrary. They act only when their intervention is sought. Judicial intervention is restrictive in nature and limited in its scope.Q.Suppose the Judiciary has intervened in the questions involving, allotment of a particular bungalow to a Judge, specific bungalows for the Judges pool, monkeys capering in colonies, stray cattle on the streets, will it be safe to say that the Judiciary is disturbing the delicate balance of the Constitution?

View answer

Passage - 3Under our Constitution, the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary all have their own broad spheres of operation. Ordinarily it is not proper for any of these three organs of the State to encroach upon the domain of another, otherwise the delicate balance in the Constitution will be upset, and there will be a reaction. Judges must know their limits and must not try to run the Government. They must have modesty and humility, and not behave like Emperors. There is broad separation of powers under the Constitution and each organ of the State the legislature, the executive and the judiciary must have respect for the others and must not encroach into each other’s domains.The theory of separation of powers first propounded by the French thinker Montesquieu (in his book ‘The Spirit of Laws broadly holds the field in India too. In chapter XI of his book ‘The Spirit of Laws’ Montesquieu writes:When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, if the judicial power be not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the legislator. Were it joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with violence and oppression.In India, the judiciary occupies an important place. The constitution visualizes an independent judiciary to safeguard the rights of citizens. In a democratic polity, the independent judiciary is a sine qua non to the effective functioning of the system. Administration has to function according to the law and the Constitution. The judiciary has an important role to play in protecting the citizen against the arbitrary exercise of power by administration. In the context of ever-expanding activities of government and discretionary powers vested in the various administrative agencies and public officials, the need to protect and safeguard the citizens rights assumes significance and priority. In developing societies where the state is playing an important role in development, judiciary has a special responsibility to ensure social justice to the underprivileged sections of the community. However, it must be admitted that the courts cannot interfere in the administrative activities on their own accord even if such activities are arbitrary. They act only when their intervention is sought. Judicial intervention is restrictive in nature and limited in its scope.Q.Suppose a Judge gives the direction to create the post of tractor driver and regularizing the services against the newly created posts, will it be right that the judiciary is entering into policy making?

View answer

Indian constitution provides for Parliamentary form of government, which is based on___.

View answer

Under our Constitution, the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary all have their own broad spheres of operation.Ordinarily it is not proper for any of these three organs of the State to encroach upon the domain of another, otherwise the delicate balance in the Constitution will be upset, and there will be a reaction. Judges must know their limits and must not try to run the Government. They must have modesty and humility, and not behave like Emperors. There is broad separation of powers under the Constitution and each organ of the State the legislature, the executive and the judiciary must have respect for the others and must not encroach into each other’s domains.The theory of separation of powers first propounded by the French thinker Montesquieu (in his book ‘The Spirit of Laws' broadly holds the field in India too. In chapter XI of his book ‘The Spirit of Laws’ Montesquieu writes:When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, if the judicial power be not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the legislator. Were it joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with violence and oppression.In India, the judiciary occupies an important place. The constitution visualizes an independent judiciary to safeguard the rights of citizens. In a democratic polity, the independent judiciary is a sine qua non to the effective functioning of the system. Administration has to function according to the law and the Constitution. The judiciary has an important role to play in protecting the citizen against the arbitrary exercise of power by administration.In the context of ever-expanding activities of government and discretionary powers vested in the various administrative agencies and public officials, the need to protect and safeguard the citizen's rights assumes significance and priority. In developing societies where the state is playing an important role in development, judiciary has a special responsibility to ensure social justice to the underprivileged sections of the community. However, it must be admitted that the courts cannot interfere in the administrative activities on their own accord even if such activities are arbitrary. They act only when their intervention is sought. Judicial intervention is restrictive in nature and limited in its scope.Q. Suppose a Judge gives the direction to create the post of tractor driver and regularizing the services against the newly created posts, will it be right that the judiciary is entering into policy making?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Constitution of India establishes Parliamentary form of government and the essence of this form of government is its responsibility to thea)People of Indiab)Presidentc)Prime Ministerd)LegislatureCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam