GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the... Start Learning for Free
The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.
  • a)
    they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclient
  • b)
    the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic nature
  • c)
    they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client
  • d)
    the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages further
  • e)
    immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamages
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose ...
The original sentence is problematic in a number of ways. First, its use of the pronoun “they” is incorrect in the first instance. The first “they” should refer to the federal judge, who is singular. Hence, the use of the plural pronoun “they” is incorrect, particularly when viewed in conjunction with the second pronoun “their” which correctly refers to the lawyers. Also, the sentence is unnecessarily wordy, with “in order to” detracting from the sentence’s conciseness. “Damages against their client” is unidiomatic.
(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.
(B) This answer choice corrects the pronoun issue. However, this sentence is even more unnecessarily wordy and awkward, replacing “economic damages” with “damages of an economic nature.” Also, “the client” is an awkward use of the article “the” given that “the client” refers to the patent holder, which appears in the sentence.
(C) The sentence incorrectly retains the first “they” pronoun error, though it omits the use of the second “their.” Also, “the client” is an awkward use of the article “the” given that “the client” refers to the patent holder, which appears in the sentence.
(D) This choice’s use of “them” incorrectly suggests that the lawyers are to be protected from economic harm rather than their client, the patent holder.
(E) CORRECT. This sentence remedies the pronoun issue, and uses “their” correctly in the second part of the sentence. It is also clear and concise.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Top Courses for GMAT

The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction againstthe hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order toprevent further economic damages against their client.a)they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against theirclientb)the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of aneconomic naturec)they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the clientd)the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages furthere)immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economicdamagesCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev