Question Description
Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle1. Master, is liable for the wrongful acts committed by servants, in the course of their employment, if third parties suffer damages in consequences.2. However the master is not liable, if the wrongful act committed by the servant has no connection whatsoever with the servant's contract of employment.3. If a person by an act lowers the reputation of another in the eye of right thinking people, then the person who suffered loss of reputation can sue for damages.Facts Tiwari is servant of Ajit. On his way to Ajit's house to report for duty, he goes to have a cup of coffee. There he sees Singh and accuses Mr Singh of being a dishonest person. Mr Singh wants to sue Ajit, as Tiwari is Ajit's servant.a)Ajit is liable, because Tiwari defamed Singhb)Ajit is not liable, as the defamation was not in the course of Tiwari's employmentc)Ajit is liable, even though the defamation was not in the course of employmentd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.