All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural number... Start Learning for Free
If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of  (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z) is
  • a)
      0
  • b)
      1
  • c)
      13
  • d)
      26
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x&m...
If a,b,c,...,x,y,z are 26 natural number then (x−a) (x−b) ... (x−x) (x−y) (y−z) = (x−a) x−b)...0 (x−y) (x−z) = 0
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x&m...
The question seems to be incomplete. Could you please provide more information or complete the expression?
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x&m...
What number we shield divide by 121 then we get the reminder 25 what is the divisor
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Absolute Liability: If an industry or enterprise is engaged in some inherently dangerous activity from which it is deriving commercial gain and that activity is capable of causing catastrophic damage then the industry officials are absolutely liable to pay compensation to the aggrieved parties. The industry cannot plead that all safety measures were taken care of by them and that there was negligence on their part. They will not be allowed any exceptions neither can they take up any defence like that of 'Act of God' or 'Act of Stranger'.Strict Liability: The Strict Liability principle is also called as 'No Fault Liability'. This is contradictory to the general principle of negligence in torts where a person can be held liable for commission of a tort only when the plaintiff can prove negligence on his part and the defendant himself is unable to disprove it. In the cases that I will now mention, the onus of being negligent can be ignored. In spite of all due care taken by the defendant, he will invariably be held for the consequences of the damages caused to any person outside of the boundary of the defendant's land by any hazardous thing that he maintained on the same stretch of land i.e. in spite of no intentional or unintentional fault of his, the defendant can be held liable hence, explaining the term 'No Fault Liability'. The earlier stated definition remains half done if the following terms are not emphasised upon:-Dangerous Thing: According to the above mentioned rule, the liability of escape of a thing from a person's land will arise only when the thing or substance collected is a dangerous thing i.e. a thing which is likely to cause mischief or damage to other people in person or their property on its escape. In various torts cases filed worldwide,liability have held "large body of water, gas, electricity, vibrations, yewEscape: The thing that has caused damage or mischief must 'escape' from the area under the occupation and control of the defendant.Non-natural use of land: Water collected on land for domestic purposes does not amount to non-natural use of land but storing it in huge quantity like that in a reservoir amounts to non-natural use of the land (Rylands vs. Fletcher). This distinction between natural and non-natural use of land can be made possible by its adjustment to existing social conditions. Growing of trees is held natural use of land but if the defendant is found to grow trees of poisonous nature on his land, then it is non-natural use of the land. If the land has been used naturally yet a conflict has risen between the defendant and the plaintiff, owing to natural use of land, the court will not hold the defendant liable.Mischief: To make the defendant liable under the doctrine of strict liability, the plaintiff needs to prove that the defendant made non-natural use of his land and escape of the dangerous thing caused mischief/damage to him. The resultant damage needs to be shown by the plaintiff after successfully proving that unnatural use of the land was done by the defendant.Q. There was spontaneous growth of thistle plants in the land owned by X. He did not check the growth of this undesired vegetation which was extending to the Y's land also only to cause him annoyance and damage. Y filed a suit against X.

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Absolute Liability: If an industry or enterprise is engaged in some inherently dangerous activity from which it is deriving commercial gain and that activity is capable of causing catastrophic damage then the industry officials are absolutely liable to pay compensation to the aggrieved parties. The industry cannot plead that all safety measures were taken care of by them and that there was negligence on their part. They will not be allowed any exceptions neither can they take up any defence like that of 'Act of God' or 'Act of Stranger'.Strict Liability: The Strict Liability principle is also called as 'No Fault Liability'. This is contradictory to the general principle of negligence in torts where a person can be held liable for commission of a tort only when the plaintiff can prove negligence on his part and the defendant himself is unable to disprove it. In the cases that I will now mention, the onus of being negligent can be ignored. In spite of all due care taken by the defendant, he will invariably be held for the consequences of the damages caused to any person outside of the boundary of the defendant's land by any hazardous thing that he maintained on the same stretch of land i.e. in spite of no intentional or unintentional fault of his, the defendant can be held liable hence, explaining the term 'No Fault Liability'. The earlier stated definition remains half done if the following terms are not emphasised upon:-Dangerous Thing: According to the above mentioned rule, the liability of escape of a thing from a person's land will arise only when the thing or substance collected is a dangerous thing i.e. a thing which is likely to cause mischief or damage to other people in person or their property on its escape. In various torts cases filed worldwide, liability have held "large body of water, gas, electricity, vibrations, yewEscape: The thing that has caused damage or mischief must 'escape' from the area under the occupation and control of the defendant.Non-natural use of land: Water collected on land for domestic purposes does not amount to non-natural use of land but storing it in huge quantity like that in a reservoir amounts to non-natural use of the land (Rylands vs. Fletcher). This distinction between natural and non-natural use of land can be made possible by its adjustment to existing social conditions. Growing of trees is held natural use of land but if the defendant is found to grow trees of poisonous nature on his land, then it is non-natural use of the land. If the land has been used naturally yet a conflict has risen between the defendant and the plaintiff, owing to natural use of land, the court will not hold the defendant liable.Mischief: To make the defendant liable under the doctrine of strict liability, the plaintiff needs to prove that the defendant made non-natural use of his land and escape of the dangerous thing caused mischief/damage to him. The resultant damage needs to be shown by the plaintiff after successfully proving that unnatural use of the land was done by the defendant.Q. V had some artificial lakes that he had formed by damming up a natural stream for several years. However, an extraordinary rainfall that year was greater and more violent than any rainfall ever witnessed there broke the artificial embankments by the stream, and the rushing water carried away with it four bridges of the land of Z.

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice If a, b, c,..., x, y, z are 26 natural numbers, then the value of (x−a) (x−b) (x−c)... (x−y) (x−z)isa)0b)1c)13d)26Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup