CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction:In this section every question is a... Start Learning for Free
Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.
Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.
Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.
Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.
Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.
  • a)
    A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by B
  • b)
    A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.
  • c)
    A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.
  • d)
    None of the above.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and pr...
A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.A special marriage, i.e. a marriage between persons from two different religious affiliations can be legally contracted in India under the provisions of the law relating to special marriages. The law relating to special marriages provides for the registration of such marriages and for divorce in such cases. One of the modes in which a special marriage can be legally terminated is through divorce by mutual consent of parties to the marriage. In order to obtain a divorce by mutual consent, both the parties to the special marriage are required to jointly present a petition for divorce to the district court on the ground that they have been living separately for one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved. At least six months after the presentation of such petition, but not later than eighteen months after the presentation of such petition, the district court, after hearing the parties and after making the necessary inquiry, and being satisfied that the marriage is a special marriage, and that the claims made in the petition are true, shall declare the marriage to be dissolved. Further, the personal presence of the parties before the district court at the time of presenting the joint petition for divorce is not mandatory, as the parties can satisfy the court even by affidavit that the requirements for granting divorce on mutual consent are fulfilled.Q. Ms. A, a Hindu female, and Mr. B, a Christian male, got married as per the law relating to special marriages in January 2018. On January 26, 2021, Ms. A and Mr. B jointly presented a petition for divorce by mutual consent before the district court on the ground that they have been inflicting mental cruelty on each other for a period of three years and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct?

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev