Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: In this section every question is...

Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.

Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.

Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.

Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house

A did not disclose the condition to B.

B later finds out and sues A for fraud.

a)
A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by B
b)
A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.
c)
A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.
d)
None of the above.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and ...

A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untruefacts.Principle II:Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the house. A did not disclose the condition to B. B later finds out and sues A for fraud.

View answer

Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Fraud implies and involves any of the following acts committed by a contracting party or his connivance or his agent with the intention of deceiving or inciting another party or his agent to enter into the agreement. Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud, unless the circumstance of the case is such that, regard being had to them, it is the duty of the person keeping silence to speak, or unless his silence, in itself, is equivalent to speech.Section 17 of the Contract Act describes fraud and lists the acts that amount to fraud, which are a false claim, active concealment, promise without the intention of carrying it out, any other deceptive act, or any act declared fraudulent. To constitute fraud, the contracting party, or any other individual with his connivance, or his agent, or to induce him to enter into the agreement, should have performed such acts. The parties have no duty to speak about facts likely to affect the consent of the other party to the contract, and mere silence does not amount to fraud unless the circumstance of the case shows that there is a duty to speak or silence equivalent to speech.To prove a case of fraud, it must be proved that representations made were false to the knowledge of the party making them. The statement must be false in substance and in fact. Positive knowledge of falsehood is not a criterion. In order to constitute fraud, it is necessary that the statement was made by the person concerned with knowledge of its falsehood, or without belief in its truth. Even mere ignorance as to the truth or falsehood of material assertion, which, however, turns out to be untrue, is deemed equivalent to the knowledge of its untruth, as also where the representor suspected that his statement might be inaccurate, or that he neglected to inquire into its accuracy.Q.A tells B that he is willing to sell his house to B for Rs. 50 Lakhs. He further claims that the house is fully furnished. B who happened to be in the locality where the house was situated decides to inquire about the house. On enquiry he realized that the house was not furnished. But he remains silent, later sues A of fraud stating that there was active concealment of facts. Decide whether fraud is committed.

View answer

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles: I. A bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, is returned to the person delivering them. The person to whom they are delivered is called the bailee and the one who delivers is called the bailor.II. The delivery to the bailee may be made by doing anything which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the intended bailee or of the person authorized to hold them on his behalf.III. The bailor is bound to disclose to the bailee the faults in the goods bailed and the bailee is bound to take as much care of the goods bailed to him as a reasonable man would.Facts: A lost his laptop while coming back from work one day. As he had to finish a very important presentation for office the next day, B, his friend, decided to give him a spare laptop which B didn't need any more. B left the laptop at A's place. While sitting through A's presentation next day, A's boss C accidently dropped his coffee on the keyboard of the laptop causing the laptop's software to crash.Did A and B enter into a proper contract of bailment?

View answer

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion.Principle II: Subject to public order, morality, and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right to manage its own affairs.Facts: X, member of a religious community ABC, wants to challenge a statute in an Indian state that outlaws all ex-communication by religious communities.Decide.

View answer

Direction:In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple-choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion.Principle II: Subject to public order, morality, and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right to manage its own affairs.Facts:X, member of a religious community ABC, wants to challenge a statute in an Indian state that outlaws all excommunication by religious communities. Decide.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices.Principle: In order to constitute fraud, there should be a representation as to certain untrue facts.Principle II: Active concealment has also been considered to be equivalent to a statement because in that case, there is a positive effort to conceal the truth and create an untrue impression in the minds of the other.Principle III: Mere silence as to facts, however is no fraud.Facts: A let his house to B which he knew was in a dilapidated condition. He also knew that the house was going to be occupied by B immediately as B is in a hurry and just takes a cursory look around the houseA did not disclose the condition to B.B later finds out and sues A for fraud.a)A has committed fraud and can hence be sued by Bb)A has not committed fraud as B had the option of checking the house properly.c)A has not committed fraud as there is no active concealment and mere silence does not amount to fraud.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam