A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > A member of the State Public Service Commissi...

A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry by

a)
a Joint Parliament Committee
b)
the Supreme Court
c)
the High Court of the concerned State
d)
a Committee constituted by the Governor

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for mis...

The correct answer is B as a member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry by supreme court.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 107 IPC, a person is said to abet the doing of a thing, who instigates any person to do that thing or engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing or intentionally aids, by an act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.Explanations to this section state that a person who, by willful misrepresentation, or by willful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing. To constitute the offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused.Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.The term 'instigate' here denotes incitement or urging to do some drastic or inadvisable action. In committing abetment, mens rea is a necessary ingredient. When a person provokes another to do an act prohibited by law, he is said to commit the offence of abetment by instigation.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence by conspiracy if he enters into an agreement with one or more persons to do an illegal act.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence if he intentionally provides assistance or gives aid by doing or omitting an act. Mere intention to provide assistance is not sufficient in these cases. To hold a person guilty and liable for abetment, there must be some active conduct on the part of the abettor and the act must be accomplished in furtherance of that.It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law of committing an offence, or that he should have the same guilty intention or knowledge as that of the abettor, or any guilty intention or knowledge. A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.Q. Aman, a public officer, is authorised by a warrant from a Court of Justice to apprehend John. Raman, knowing that fact and also that Chetan is not John, willfully represents to Aman that Chetan is John, and thereby intentionally causes Aman to apprehend Chetan. Decide.

View answer

________ can establish additional courts for better administration of any existing law on amatter in the Union List?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 107 IPC, a person is said to abet the doing of a thing, who instigates any person to do that thing or engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing or intentionally aids, by an act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.Explanations to this section state that a person who, by willful misrepresentation, or by willful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing. To constitute the offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused.Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.The term 'instigate' here denotes incitement or urging to do some drastic or inadvisable action. In committing abetment, mens rea is a necessary ingredient. When a person provokes another to do an act prohibited by law, he is said to commit the offence of abetment by instigation.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence by conspiracy if he enters into an agreement with one or more persons to do an illegal act.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence if he intentionally provides assistance or gives aid by doing or omitting an act. Mere intention to provide assistance is not sufficient in these cases. To hold a person guilty and liable for abetment, there must be some active conduct on the part of the abettor and the act must be accomplished in furtherance of that.It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law of committing an offence, or that he should have the same guilty intention or knowledge as that of the abettor, or any guilty intention or knowledge. A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.Q. Siya, in India, instigates North, a foreigner in Poland, to commit a murder in Poland. Who would be held guilty?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 107 IPC, a person is said to abet the doing of a thing, who instigates any person to do that thing or engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing or intentionally aids, by an act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.Explanations to this section state that a person who, by willful misrepresentation, or by willful concealment of a material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that thing. To constitute the offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused.Whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.The term 'instigate' here denotes incitement or urging to do some drastic or inadvisable action. In committing abetment, mens rea is a necessary ingredient. When a person provokes another to do an act prohibited by law, he is said to commit the offence of abetment by instigation.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence by conspiracy if he enters into an agreement with one or more persons to do an illegal act.A person is said to abet the commission of an offence if he intentionally provides assistance or gives aid by doing or omitting an act. Mere intention to provide assistance is not sufficient in these cases. To hold a person guilty and liable for abetment, there must be some active conduct on the part of the abettor and the act must be accomplished in furtherance of that.It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law of committing an offence, or that he should have the same guilty intention or knowledge as that of the abettor, or any guilty intention or knowledge. A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in India, abets the commission of any act without and beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.Q. Shikha instigates Madan to murder Shubh. Madan in pursuance of the instigation stabs Shubh. Shubh recovers from the wound. Decide the liability and answer accordingly.

View answer

Which committee of Parliament is concerned with the regularity and economy in government expenditure?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A member of the State Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehavior only after an inquiry bya)a Joint Parliament Committeeb)the Supreme Courtc)the High Court of the concerned Stated)a Committee constituted by the GovernorCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam