The Parliament enjoys the right to impose reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights in India. The Constitution of India guarantees certain Fundamental Rights to its citizens. These rights are considered essential for the overall development and protection of individual liberties. However, these rights are not absolute and are subject to certain restrictions.

The Parliament, as the legislative body of the country, has the authority to impose reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights. This power is granted under Article 19 of the Constitution, which deals with the right to freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association, movement, residence, and profession.

Under Article 19, the Parliament can pass laws that impose restrictions on these rights in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign countries, public order, decency, morality, contempt of court, defamation, and incitement to an offense.

The power of the Parliament to impose restrictions on Fundamental Rights is not unlimited. The restrictions must be reasonable and cannot violate the essence of the rights themselves. The reasonableness of the restrictions is subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court, as the highest judicial authority in the country, has the power to strike down any law passed by the Parliament if it violates the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The court examines whether the restrictions imposed by the Parliament are reasonable and necessary in a democratic society. If the court finds that the restrictions are excessive or arbitrary, it can declare them unconstitutional and nullify the law.

In summary, while the Parliament has the authority to impose reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights, these restrictions are subject to scrutiny by the Supreme Court. The court acts as a check on the Parliament's power to ensure that the rights of individuals are protected and not unduly curtailed.