PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who dont own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capita...

Join the Discussion on the App

Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollution in Papula by 20% in the next 5 years?

a)
Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.
b)
The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.
c)
Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.
d)
In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.
e)
Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Critical Reasoning- 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an a...

Argument Analysis

As per a survey:
- an average middle-aged person drive 2000 miles a year and almost all of them own a gasoline-run car
- Most of these middle-aged guys would switch their cars to electric ones, if the costs of making the switch are not high
The government of Papula is planning to implement a plan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars at a minimal cost.

UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTION STEM:

The given question is a weaken question; however the conclusion is not stated in the passage but is given in the question stem. Basically, when we say that the conclusion is stated in the question stem, what we mean is that the statement that needs to be weakened is in the question stem.

So, the relevant conclusion is: The plan, as envisaged by the government of Papula, will be able to significantly reduce the air pollution in the country in the next five years.

Pre-Thinking

The author in this question makes predictions about the behavior of a population based on data from survey from a sample of the population – middle aged people. Hence, while making the prediction the author makes the assumption that the sample data must be representative of the population data or the preferences of the sample must be representative of the preferences of the majority.

One easy to spot weak point of the argument is that the plan of the government is based on the data of only middle-aged persons whereas the objective that needs to be achieved i.e. reduction in pollution will depend on other sections of population also. Besides, there is nothing to suggest in the passage that middle-aged population is responsible for a large proportion of the total pollution in the country. Thus, we can pre-think two weakeners for the given argument:

Any statement that suggests that other sections of population have preferences which are different from middle-aged population
Any statement that suggests that middle-aged population accounts for only a small proportion of the total population in the country

Answer Choices

Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.

The success of the plan does not require each and every citizen to use the plan. There could be exceptions. This kind of answer choice is one of common type of incorrect choices used by GMAT in weaken question type. Incorrect.

The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.

We are concerned with the impact of the plan on the pollution in the country. The impact the plan has on the financial status of the country is not the concern of the argument. Incorrect.

Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.

This statement actually captures both the weakeners that we came up with during the pre-thinking stage. It not only tells that a majority of population is not middle-aged, it also tells that the majority of population prefers convenience, something that the government has not taken into consideration while coming up with it’s plan. Therefore, this statement weakens the conclusion. Correct.

In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.

This statement tell us that the number of cars have increased in the country. But as per the plan, these cars would be replaced with electric ones and once that is done, the pollution should decrease, doesn’t matter the number of cars. Therefore, this option doesn’t affect the conclusion. Incorrect.

Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.

Like option 2, this option also tries to cast a doubt on whether the plan can be implemented. However, within the context of the conclusion, we are not concerned about such a thing. Incorrect.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Globally, about a third of the food produced for human consumption goes to waste, implying that a third of the water, land use, energy and financial resources that go into producing it are also squandered. Yet people often think of food as environmentally benign because it is biodegradable, while label food packaging as a wasteful use of resources leading to nothing but more pollution, despite the reality that the energy that goes into packaging makes up a mere 10% of the total energy that goes into producing, transporting, storing and preparing food. Needless to say, their view ignores the negative impact of food production, supply, and consumption, and the benefits possible from the right kind of food packaging.Indeed the dislike for food packaging is not all baseless. There is a lot of bad and wasteful packaging out there. But any assessment of its impact on the environment must take into account the benefits one can derive from packaging in the shape of reduced food waste that can be realized by protecting and dispensing food properly. For instance, two percent of the milk produced in the US goes bad on supermarket shelves before it can be purchased. This dairy waste can be avoided with packaging technology such as Tetra Pak that saves milk from spoiling, even without refrigeration. However, environmentally aware consumers tend to dislike Tetra Pak material because they think it cannot be recycled. The truth, however, is that it can be recycled, but the process is rather complicated. Irrespective of the recycling aspect, Tetra Pak is a good environmental bet because it can extend the shelf life of milk up to nine months, reducing the need for refrigeration and reducing the amount of milk that goes bad on retail shelves. Clearly, the environmental benefit of the food-protection technology outweighs the negative impact of the packaging itself.Which of the following statement can be derived from the passage?

View answer

Globally, about a third of the food produced for human consumption goes to waste, implying that a third of the water, land use, energy and financial resources that go into producing it are also squandered. Yet people often think of food as environmentally benign because it is biodegradable, while label food packaging as a wasteful use of resources leading to nothing but more pollution, despite the reality that the energy that goes into packaging makes up a mere 10% of the total energy that goes into producing, transporting, storing and preparing food. Needless to say, their view ignores the negative impact of food production, supply, and consumption, and the benefits possible from the right kind of food packaging.Indeed the dislike for food packaging is not all baseless. There is a lot of bad and wasteful packaging out there. But any assessment of its impact on the environment must take into account the benefits one can derive from packaging in the shape of reduced food waste that can be realized by protecting and dispensing food properly. For instance, two percent of the milk produced in the US goes bad on supermarket shelves before it can be purchased. This dairy waste can be avoided with packaging technology such as Tetra Pak that saves milk from spoiling, even without refrigeration. However, environmentally aware consumers tend to dislike Tetra Pak material because they think it cannot be recycled. The truth, however, is that it can be recycled, but the process is rather complicated. Irrespective of the recycling aspect, Tetra Pak is a good environmental bet because it can extend the shelf life of milk up to nine months, reducing the need for refrigeration and reducing the amount of milk that goes bad on retail shelves. Clearly, the environmental benefit of the food-protection technology outweighs the negative impact of the packaging itself.Which of the following is the function of the first paragraph in the passage?

View answer

Globally, about a third of the food produced for human consumption goes to waste, implying that a third of the water, land use, energy and financial resources that go into producing it are also squandered. Yet people often think of food as environmentally benign because it is biodegradable, while label food packaging as a wasteful use of resources leading to nothing but more pollution, despite the reality that the energy that goes into packaging makes up a mere 10% of the total energy that goes into producing, transporting, storing and preparing food. Needless to say, their view ignores the negative impact of food production, supply, and consumption, and the benefits possible from the right kind of food packaging.Indeed the dislike for food packaging is not all baseless. There is a lot of bad and wasteful packaging out there. But any assessment of its impact on the environment must take into account the benefits one can derive from packaging in the shape of reduced food waste that can be realized by protecting and dispensing food properly. For instance, two percent of the milk produced in the US goes bad on supermarket shelves before it can be purchased. This dairy waste can be avoided with packaging technology such as Tetra Pak that saves milk from spoiling, even without refrigeration. However, environmentally aware consumers tend to dislike Tetra Pak material because they think it cannot be recycled. The truth, however, is that it can be recycled, but the process is rather complicated. Irrespective of the recycling aspect, Tetra Pak is a good environmental bet because it can extend the shelf life of milk up to nine months, reducing the need for refrigeration and reducing the amount of milk that goes bad on retail shelves. Clearly, the environmental benefit of the food-protection technology outweighs the negative impact of the packaging itself.The author is primarily concerned with

View answer

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability. In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

View answer

Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.As urban landscapes continue to expand, the rise of vertical farming is becoming a crucial element in the quest for sustainable city living. Vertical farms, which grow crops in stacked layers within a controlled environment, offer a revolutionary approach to agriculture in urban settings. This innovative method of farming is not just about saving space; its about reimagining how we produce food in the face of growing environmental challenges.One of the key advantages of vertical farming is its minimal use of water and pesticides. Unlike traditional agriculture, which relies heavily on these resources, vertical farms use hydroponic systems that circulate water efficiently and eliminate the need for soil and large-scale pesticide use. This approach significantly reduces the environmental impact of farming.Another significant benefit is the reduction in food miles. Vertical farms can be established within urban areas, drastically cutting down the distance food travels from farm to consumer. This not only ensures fresher produce but also reduces transportation emissions, contributing to lower carbon footprints.However, vertical farming faces its own set of challenges. The initial setup and operational costs can be high, making it difficult for these farms to compete with traditional agriculture in terms of cost. Additionally, the energy requirements for maintaining controlled environments, such as lighting and temperature control, are substantial. Critics argue that unless renewable energy sources power these farms, they may not be as sustainable as they seem.Despite these challenges, the potential of vertical farming in reshaping urban agriculture remains immense. As technology advances, the efficiency of these farms is expected to improve, making them a vital component in the development of sustainable cities.Q.Based on the passage, which of the following can be inferred about vertical farms compared to traditional farms?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PerarecentsurveycarriedoutinRamboCity, capital of Papula country, an average middle-aged person drives his or her car for two thousand milesinayear and 99% of these people ownagasoline-run car.Inaddition, thesurveysuggested that if offered an economical option to switch to electric cars, most of these people would change their gasoline-run cars. The government of Papula is impressed with the environmental considerations shown by the citizens of Papula and is planning to implementaplan that would allow all the current owners of gasoline-run cars to switch to electric cars ataminimal cost.Which of the following statements casts the most doubt on the ability of the plan to meet its required objective of reducing air pollutioninPapula by 20%inthe next 5 years?a)Though some of the citizens are concerned about the negative environmental impact of air pollution, they will not spend any extra money to protect the environment.b)The budget deficit of the government of Papula is already at alarming levels, and any further increase in the deficit could lead to the bankruptcy of the country.c)Since Papula is an aging country, with more than half its population near retirement age, the chief consideration for a large number of its citizens is the convenience to drive rather than the costs to do so.d)In the last two decades, Papula has emerged as a major economic hub, leading to an increase in the living standard of its citizens and in the number of cars in the region.e)Since people who don’t own gasoline cars would not be benefitted from the proposed plan, they may strongly oppose the use of taxpayer money on such a plan.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam