Question Description
Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle – No offence is committed by aperson who, during that act, is, by reason ofintoxication, incapable of knowing the natureof the act, whether it is wrong or contrary tolaw; provided that the thing that intoxicatedhim was administered without his knowledgeor against his will.Facts - Kamath consumed an entire bottle ofbrandy than his usual drink of vodka. On theway back to his hostel, he tried to strangle hisfriend. Would Kamath be held liable?a)Kamath is liable since he committed the act ina state of intoxication.b)Kamath is not liable as he was unaware thatbrandy would have this effect on him.c)Kamath is liable as he consumed brandyvoluntarily and was fully aware of theconsequences of his crime.d)Kamath is not liable as he did not consumehis customary drink and committed the actunder the influence of alcohol.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.