Question Description
DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide:a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she genuinely did not intend to get the paper publishedb)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since she honestly believed it to be the truthc)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since the sentence is published and has damaged Katie's reputation in her buildingd)Karen is liable for defamation since she forgot about the piece of paper and negligently left it lying aroundCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.