GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Irrespective of the general state of the econ... Start Learning for Free
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.
To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.
However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.
As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?
  • a)
    Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.
  • b)
    Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer. 
  • c)
    Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.
  • d)
    Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.
  • e)
    Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the ...
Passage Analysis
Summary and Main Point
 
 
 
This is an Application based question. We need to go back to the relevant section of the passage and read the description of the dip in prices that the author states is not necessarily bad. The author says that:
A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers.
So, as we can see, a dip in prices that caused by not a consistent reduction in demand but by progressive factors such technological breakthroughs and increased competition might actually be good. Keeping this information in mind, we need to evaluate the following answer choices.
Answer Choices
A
Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.
Incorrect: Opposite
We are told that though the diamond becomes cheaper, it loses its unique selling appeal as a luxury product. So, it is possible that many people may not want to buy it because it is not considered luxurious anymore. In such a situation, the dip in price benefits neither the consumer nor the producer. 
B
Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer. 
Incorrect: Partial Scope
Although the buyer who bought the product at a cheaper price might have benefitted from the deal, the producer had to compromise on its profits because of a significant reduction in price. So, the producer, in all likelihood, did not benefit from the situation.
C
Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
Although we are told that the producers will realize savings on their cost of production, we are not told whether they lower their prices because of these savings.  Hence the benefit to the consumer is uncertain.
D
Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.
Incorrect: Opposite
Although the cause of price dip is not a reduction in demand, the effect is production cuts- something that is listed in the passage as a cause for perpetuating deflation.  Thus this scenario does not benefit anyone.
E
Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.
Correct
In this situation the benefits of the new technology are reaped both by the producer and by the consumer. Here’s how:
Producer = lower costs due to new technology
Consumer = lower price because of lower costs
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis--vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis--vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis--vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following describes the function of the final paragraph?

Read the passage and answer the question given below.Is it possible to decrease inflation without causing a recession and its concomitant increase in unemployment? The orthodox answer is “no.” whether they support the “inertia” theory of inflation (that today’s inflation rate is caused by yesterday’s inflation, the state of the economic cycle, and external influences such as import prices) or the “rational expectations” theory (that inflation is caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations, coupled with a lack of credible monetary and fiscal policies), most economists agree that tight monetary and fiscal policies, which cause recessions, are necessary to decelerate inflation. They point out that in the 1980’s, many European countries and the United States conquered high (by these countries’ standards) inflation, but only by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies that sharply increased unemployment. Nevertheless, some governments’ policymakers insist that direct controls on wages and prices, without tight monetary and fiscal policies, can succeed in decreasing inflation. Unfortunately, because this approach fails to deal with the underlying causes of inflation, wage and price controls eventually collapse, the hitherto-repressed inflation resurfaces, and in the meantime, though the policymakers succeed in avoiding a recession, a frozen structure of relative prices imposes distortions that do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls?

Top Courses for GMAT

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?a)Because of a breakthrough in diamond mining, the price of the diamond dips, with it becoming affordable for more people but losing its unique selling appeal as a luxury item.b)Because of the cancellation of an order, the producer reduces the price of the goods in stock considerably and sells them to another buyer.c)Because of a change in policy, producers can now procure raw materials for producing garments at cheaper prices from nearby countries and hence save on their cost of production.d)Because of an increasing competition from cheaply produced and imported goods, the local producers reduce the prices of their goods to sell off their existing stock at initiate production cuts.e)Because of a new technology, the manufacturers of personal computers are able to reduce their cost of production and pass these savings to the consumers as well by lowering the prices.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev