GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Irrespective of the general state of the econ... Start Learning for Free
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.
To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.
However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.
Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?
  • a)
    Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.
  • b)
    The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.
  • c)
    Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.
  • d)
    Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices. 
  • e)
    Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs. 
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the ...
Passage Analysis
Summary and Main Point
 
 
This is an Inference question. Since this is a general inference question, we cannot pre-think on specific lines. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that four out of the five given answer choices will not follow from what is stated in the passage; these answer choices are INCORRECT. Select the answer choice that is bolstered by the specific facts mentioned in the passage. 
Answer Choices
A
Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
There is no given information on this kind of comparative analysis. While pitching them against each other, the author states that deflation is considered a bigger evil than inflation, meaning that the harmful effects of deflation are considered worse than those of inflation. However, this is not sufficient information to conclude that inflation can be beneficial.
B
The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.
Correct
The author mentions clearly in the first paragraph that the decision to delay purchasing adds to the pressure faced by producers that in turn leads to unemployment and even less demand for goods, decreasing prices even further. Hence, we can infer the statement given in choice B.
C
Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
In the last paragraph, the author differentiates between a dip caused by factors other than decreasing demand and deflation. On the basis of this information, we cannot conclude that deflation does not have a lot in common with dips not SUBSTANTIALLY caused by decreasing demand. 
D
Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices. 
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
The author states in the first paragraph that the producers resort to production cuts since they have enough stock in their inventory (because of lack of sufficient demand). However, nowhere is it indicated or given that these cuts lead to any kind of increase in prices. In fact, if anything, we are told that the unemployment caused by these cuts leads to further decrease in prices.
E
Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs. 
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
We are told that deflation often occurs in a slowdown when the demand is less compared to the supply. However, this statement does not mean that every time the demand is less, there will be deflation.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the ...
Passage Analysis
Summary and Main Point
 
 
This is an Inference question. Since this is a general inference question, we cannot pre-think on specific lines. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that four out of the five given answer choices will not follow from what is stated in the passage; these answer choices are INCORRECT. Select the answer choice that is bolstered by the specific facts mentioned in the passage. 
Answer Choices
A
Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
There is no given information on this kind of comparative analysis. While pitching them against each other, the author states that deflation is considered a bigger evil than inflation, meaning that the harmful effects of deflation are considered worse than those of inflation. However, this is not sufficient information to conclude that inflation can be beneficial.
B
The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.
Correct
The author mentions clearly in the first paragraph that the decision to delay purchasing adds to the pressure faced by producers that in turn leads to unemployment and even less demand for goods, decreasing prices even further. Hence, we can infer the statement given in choice B.
C
Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
In the last paragraph, the author differentiates between a dip caused by factors other than decreasing demand and deflation. On the basis of this information, we cannot conclude that deflation does not have a lot in common with dips not SUBSTANTIALLY caused by decreasing demand. 
D
Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices. 
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
The author states in the first paragraph that the producers resort to production cuts since they have enough stock in their inventory (because of lack of sufficient demand). However, nowhere is it indicated or given that these cuts lead to any kind of increase in prices. In fact, if anything, we are told that the unemployment caused by these cuts leads to further decrease in prices.
E
Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs. 
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
We are told that deflation often occurs in a slowdown when the demand is less compared to the supply. However, this statement does not mean that every time the demand is less, there will be deflation.
Free Test
Community Answer
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the ...
Passage Analysis
Summary and Main Point
 
 
This is an Inference question. Since this is a general inference question, we cannot pre-think on specific lines. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that four out of the five given answer choices will not follow from what is stated in the passage; these answer choices are INCORRECT. Select the answer choice that is bolstered by the specific facts mentioned in the passage. 
Answer Choices
A
Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
There is no given information on this kind of comparative analysis. While pitching them against each other, the author states that deflation is considered a bigger evil than inflation, meaning that the harmful effects of deflation are considered worse than those of inflation. However, this is not sufficient information to conclude that inflation can be beneficial.
B
The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.
Correct
The author mentions clearly in the first paragraph that the decision to delay purchasing adds to the pressure faced by producers that in turn leads to unemployment and even less demand for goods, decreasing prices even further. Hence, we can infer the statement given in choice B.
C
Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
In the last paragraph, the author differentiates between a dip caused by factors other than decreasing demand and deflation. On the basis of this information, we cannot conclude that deflation does not have a lot in common with dips not SUBSTANTIALLY caused by decreasing demand. 
D
Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices. 
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
The author states in the first paragraph that the producers resort to production cuts since they have enough stock in their inventory (because of lack of sufficient demand). However, nowhere is it indicated or given that these cuts lead to any kind of increase in prices. In fact, if anything, we are told that the unemployment caused by these cuts leads to further decrease in prices.
E
Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs. 
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
We are told that deflation often occurs in a slowdown when the demand is less compared to the supply. However, this statement does not mean that every time the demand is less, there will be deflation.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis--vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.As per the passage, which of the following would most likely be considered a dip in prices beneficial to both the consumer and the producer?

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis--vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis--vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following describes the function of the final paragraph?

Read the passage and answer the question given below.Is it possible to decrease inflation without causing a recession and its concomitant increase in unemployment? The orthodox answer is “no.” whether they support the “inertia” theory of inflation (that today’s inflation rate is caused by yesterday’s inflation, the state of the economic cycle, and external influences such as import prices) or the “rational expectations” theory (that inflation is caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations, coupled with a lack of credible monetary and fiscal policies), most economists agree that tight monetary and fiscal policies, which cause recessions, are necessary to decelerate inflation. They point out that in the 1980’s, many European countries and the United States conquered high (by these countries’ standards) inflation, but only by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies that sharply increased unemployment. Nevertheless, some governments’ policymakers insist that direct controls on wages and prices, without tight monetary and fiscal policies, can succeed in decreasing inflation. Unfortunately, because this approach fails to deal with the underlying causes of inflation, wage and price controls eventually collapse, the hitherto-repressed inflation resurfaces, and in the meantime, though the policymakers succeed in avoiding a recession, a frozen structure of relative prices imposes distortions that do damage to the economy’s prospects for long-term growth.Q. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls?

Top Courses for GMAT

Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Irrespective of the general state of the economy, paying less for the same thing appeals to most consumers, who seem to have an intuitive dislike for inflation. But much as we may like to pay less, a sustained decline in prices, deflation, may not be in our best interests. Deflation, in fact, is considered to be a bigger evil than inflation, and evokes strong action by policymakers who would try everything possible to prop up prices. Deflation often results from a slowdown in which reduction in demand vis-à-vis supply causes prices to dip. With a sharp decline in prices, consumers tend to postpone purchases in the belief that prices will head further lower. This adds to the pressure on businesses, which in addition to a fall in prices also see an accumulation of inventory. Production cuts are hence resorted to, resulting in factory closures and consequent layoffs or salary cuts. With unemployment increasing, income levels in the economy fall, leading to further cuts in consumer spending and more pressure on prices. A vicious cycle emerges; the cascade effect is felt across sectors; and the economy goes into defeatist mode.To prevent deflations and to tackle the downward spiral caused by them, governments resort to large-scale spending, undertaking massive projects to increase employment, incomes, and prices and pumping in huge sums of money to propel demand. For instance, in the aftermath of the financial market crash in 2008, the US government undertook big-ticket stimulus measures and QE (quantitative easing) to revive the economy.However, not all dips in prices are bad. A fall in prices of goods and services due to technological innovations and increased competition could actually benefit both the consumers and the producers. Such a situation is very different from deflation, which affects prices across the economy on a sustained basis (mainly due to decreasing demand or liquidity problems) and which should indeed be considered a red flag.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Although inflation can be beneficial for the economy deflation cannot be.b)The decision to buy a product later in the hope of benefitting from a further price reduction is part of the cyclical chain of events that breeds deflation.c)Deflation has little in common with dips in prices that are not substantially caused by decreasing demand.d)Production cuts undertaken due to accumulated inventory help producers deal with an excess supply, leading to a momentary increase in prices.e)Whenever supply exceeds current demand, deflation occurs.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev