For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > For once, the whys are turning out to be more...

Join the Discussion on the App

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated on how to achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly about why they want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.

To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.

Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.

Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?

a)
The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.
b)
The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.
c)
The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.
d)
The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.
e)
The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Reading Comprehension: Economics

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows....

Passage Analysis

Summary and Main Point

This is an Inference question. More specifically, it can be categorized as an “Application” question. You are required to take your understanding of the circumstances described by the study authors as ideal for the prescribed strategy to be effective and apply it to each of the situations mentioned below to evaluate which one fits the bill. The two situations described as especially conducive to the effectiveness of the strategy are:

(1) when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or

(2) when other goal-directed activities become available

Answer Choices

The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.

Incorrect: Out of Scope

Not knowing why one wants to achieve a goal does not fall in either of the two situations described in the passage.

The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.

Incorrect: Out of Context

The out of plan goal-directed activities only come in to the picture as effective alternatives to achieving the desired goal and therefore, their lack, by no means, indicates that the original plan is not feasible.

The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.

Incorrect: Out of Scope

Realizing that the definition of the goal is not clear will work neither for the original plan and nor for the strategy prescribed by the study’s authors. Hence, this too doesn’t fall in the two situations described in the passage.

The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.

Correct

This choice describes a circumstance in which the consumer is able to perceive a problem with the practicality or feasibility of the plan. Hence, it matches the first circumstance described in the passage and in our pre-thinking.

The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.

Incorrect: Out of Scope

This choice too fails to describe a circumstance that falls in either of the two situations described in the passage. Finding the original plan less attractive for reasons other than feasibility issues or availability of other goal-directed activities is beyond the scope of the circumstances described.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Each of the following is a statement that is mentioned with respect to the study described in the passage EXCEPT

View answer

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following statement can be derived on the basis of the analysis done by the study authors?

View answer

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Through the second paragraph, the author of the passage intends to

View answer

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.The author is primarily concerned with

View answer

Individual studies and experiments the world over have shown that a strong correlation exists between music and mood --- listening to a particular kind of music impacts the mood of the listener. In fact studies have also shown that, in everyday life, music is primarily used for mood and emotion regulation. Indeed, one of the reasons music is able to transcend the barriers of language and garner universal appeal is the emotional response it evokes in its listeners. However, not all people respond similarly to the same kind of music.A new study shows that listening to the same piece of sad music can actually make some people happy while others sad. Clearly, the difference in the response generated is due to the difference or the lack of the same in the perceived and the induced emotions experienced by the participants. Perceived emotion is defined as the act of sensing the emotional content of the stimuli whereas induced emotion is the emotion felt by the receiver after being subjected to the stimuli.In the study, the participants with a higher level of exposure to and knowledge of music were the ones who reported being happy after listening to the music, while others reported as being sad. These participants rated the piece of sad music as highly unpleasant on the scale of perceived emotions; however, their induced emotion score was really low for the level of unpleasantness experienced by them and hence did not match with their perceived emotions score. For this reason, these participants felt that they could enjoy the piece of music without feeling sad and hence reported their emotional state as closer to being happy.However, the findings of the study do not necessarily suggest that the perceived emotion score by the not so musically literate was low. It could just mean that either their perceived and induced emotion scores coincided or that the difference between the two was insignificant.Which of the following is the function of the final paragraph in the passage?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the person's response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the “why” and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of “why”. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Which of the following is an example of a scenario in which the strategy suggested by the authors of the study in the last sentence of the passage would be most effective?a)The consumer is not able to determine the reason behind the pursuit of the goal.b)The consumer is not able to pursue the desired goal because of reasons not unrelated to the lack of out of plan goal-directed activities.c)The consumer realizes that the plan is not clear as the definition of the goal is not clear.d)The consumer is able to perceive issues related to practicality of the plan.e)The original plan becomes less attractive to the consumer as he/she moves closer to the desired goal.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam