DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Womenandrsquo;s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Womenandrsquo;s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Womenandrsquo;s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Womenandrsquo;s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Womenandrsquo;s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences...

DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.

Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.

a)
Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed
b)
Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on
c)
Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed
d)
Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence ...

(a)“ In her opinion, she thought’ and ‘passed on’ are redundancy error, incorrect usage. ‘rose up’ is also same kind one. So answer is (a).

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.

View answer

Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.Article 16(1) of the Constitution reads:“16 (1) There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State.”Which of the following, if held by the Supreme Court in a future case, will weaken the Supreme Court’s position in the current case the most?

View answer

It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.Article 16(1) of the Constitution reads: “16. (1) There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State.”Which of the following, if held by the Supreme Court in a future case, will weaken the Supreme Court’s position in the current case the most?

View answer

It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.On what basis did the Supreme Court, in the judgment in question, set aside the Uttarakhand High Court’s order?

View answer

Passage - 4A Supreme Court bench of justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta ruled that states are not bound to make reservations, nor is reservation in promotions a [1]. The top court said that it cannot order state governments to provide reservations."In view of the law laid down by this court, there is no doubt that the state government is not bound to make reservations. There is no [1 ] which inheres in an individual to claim reservation in promotions. No [2] can be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations," the bench said in its order.The state governments can grant reservation to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes at their own discretion, but will have to collect quantifiable data which shows their inadequate representation in public services. The Supreme Court has said that states can grant reservation to certain classes, but "there must be some material on the basis of which the opinion is formed". The Supreme Court decision came against pleas regarding [3] governments September 5, 2012 decision to fill up all posts in public services in the state without providing reservations to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The governments decision was challenged in the [3] High Court, which struck it down. The Supreme Court referred to Article [4] and its clauses 4 and 4A while delivering its judgement in the matter. Article [4] in the Constitution of India refers to equality of opportunity in government jobs.Q.Which of the following cannot be issued by the court directing the state government to provide reservations whose name has been redacted with [2] in the passage above?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONS:In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.Q. The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed onCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam