All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentence... Start Learning for Free
DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.
The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.
  • a)
    Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed
  • b)
    Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on
  • c)
    Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed
  • d)
    Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence...
(a)“ In her opinion, she thought’ and ‘passed on’ are redundancy error, incorrect usage. ‘rose up’ is also same kind one. So answer is (a).
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence...
The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women.

A) she thought that the Women
B) she thought of the Women
C) she believed the Women
D) she believed that the Women

The best alternative among the four is A) she thought that the Women.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.Article 16(1) of the Constitution reads:“16 (1) There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State.”Which of the following, if held by the Supreme Court in a future case, will weaken the Supreme Court’s position in the current case the most?

Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.On what basis did the Supreme Court, in the judgment in question, set aside the Uttarakhand High Court’s order?

It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.On what basis did the Supreme Court, in the judgment in question, set aside the Uttarakhand High Court’s order?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONS: In each of the following sentences, a part of the sentence is underlined. Beneath each sentence, four different ways of phrasing the underlined part are indicated. Choose the best alternative among the four.The MP rose up to say that in her opinion, she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed on unanimously.a)Rose to say that she thought the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedb)Rose up to say that, the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passed onc)Rose to say that. In her opinion, she thought that the Women’s Reservation Bill should be passedd)Rose to say that, in her opinion, the Women’s Reservation Bill be passed on 11.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup