Question Description
PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PRINCIPLE: Master is liable for the wrongful acts committed by his servant; provided the acts are committed during the course of employment. However, the master is not liable if the wrongful act committed by his servant has no connection whatsoever with the servants contract of employment.FACTS: D is a driver employed by M, who is the owner of a company. During the lunch time, D goes to a close by tea shop to have a cup of tea. There he picks up fight with the tea shop owner (T), which resulted in some damage to his shop. T wants to sue M for claiming compensation for the damage caused by the fight. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)M will be liable because D is his servantb)Both M and D will be liable.c)M will not be liable because the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of D’s employment.d)M will be liable albeit the wrongful act (picking up fight) was not committed in the course of his employmentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.