UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  You have just found that one of your colleagu... Start Learning for Free
You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will,  
  • a)
    ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.
  • b)
    report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.
  • c)
    contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.
  • d)
    speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his off...
The best course would be to approach the Ethics Committee. Any proceedings of the committee would be part of official record and the committee would also have the authority to ensure compliance would also have the authority to ensure compliance with its decision. Moreover, since there is a clear company policy regarding such behaviour, you should follow the method prescribed in the policy for dealing with such a situation. The next best option would be to speak to your colleague directly. Ignoring the matter would not be in your interest of your organization. Similarly contacting the vendors would not deal with the root of the problem since the vendors are only responding to the other made by your colleagues in order to secure their own business.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Group QuestionAnswer the following question based on the information given below.In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. For which event did China send the maximum number of Marks participants?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. How many countries did not send even a single participant in any one event?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Considering all the participants sent by the five countries put together, how many instances were there wherein exactly one participant was sent by a country for an event?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Which country sent the maximum number of participants for the high jump event?

In the 2006 Common Wealth games, there was participation from five different countries - USA, China, UK, Australia and Japan. From each of these five countries there were athletes participating in one of the five following events: shot put, javelin, high jump, long jump and marathon. Each participant was allowed to participate in exactly one of the five events.Further it is known that there were at least two participants and at most ten participants from each country and the total number of participants from all the five countries put together was a perfect square.The following information is also available:I. The number of participants in javelin was exactly half the number of participants in each of the other events.II. USA sent an equal number of participants in shot put, high jump and long jump.III. The maximum number of participants sent by Japan is for the long jump event and each country sent at least one participant for the long jump and shot put events.IV. The number of participants from China was two more than that from USA, which in turn was one more than that from UK, which in turn was one more than that from Australia which in turn was one more than that from Japan.V. Except Japan, all the other countries sent at least one participant for the javelin event while Japan sent at least one participant in each of the remaining events.VI. The number of participants sent by China for each of the events was different and there were no participants from China for the high jump event.VII. The number of participants in the marathon event sent by all the other countries other than China is equal.Q. Which among the following is definitely FALSE?

Top Courses for UPSC

You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice You have just found that one of your colleagues has been using his official position to secretly demand gifts and favors from the vendors who supply materials to your organization, with the promise to finalize the contract in their favor. Given this situation you will, a)ignore the matter since it is none of your business as to how your colleague decides to perform his official work, as long as he gets a good deal for the company.b)report the matter to the Ethics Committee, as stated in the company policy and let them decide on the necessary course of action.c)contact the vendors and threaten to cancel their contracts if they participate in such dubious practices.d)speak directly to the said colleague regarding his actions and ask him to discontinue such practices.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev