Question Description
Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle: When there is an infringement of the legal right of a person, he gets a right to sue the wrongdoer for remedy irrespective of any actual loss caused.Fact Situation: Saroj is prevented from voting at an election. The candidate she intended to vote for, wins the election.Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Saroj’s legal right has been violated and she can sue the persons who prevented her from votingb)Since Saroj‘s candidate has won the election, her rights are not violated and she cannot sue.c)Since Saroj is not the candidate, her rights are not violated if she is prevented from voting.d)This principle is not at all applicable in this case.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.