All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Three children were fighting over a stick of ... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?
Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They en...
Let the length of the second part be x metres.
Length of the first part = 5x and, length of the third part = 5x - 17
So 5x + x + 5x - 17 = 60
11x = 77
x = 7
The length of the three parts will be 35 m, 7 m and 18 m. The length of the longest part is 35 m.
Answer: 35
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They en...
Let the 3 parts of the stick be x,y,z respectively
hence x+y+z=60 (given)
y= x÷5 (given)
z= x-17 (given)
hence, x+(x/5)+x-17=60
solve for x and you'll get 35
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They en...
Let the length of the second part be x metres.
Length of the first part = 5x and, length of the third part = 5x - 17
So 5x + x + 5x - 17 = 60
11x = 77
x = 7
The length of the three parts will be 35 m, 7 m and 18 m. The length of the longest part is 35 m.
Answer: 35
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The tale of reading begins when the retina receives photons reflected off the written page. But the retina is not a homogeneous sensor. Only its central part, called the fovea, is dense in high-resolution cells sensitive to incoming light, while the rest of the retina has a coarser resolution. The fovea, which occupies about 15 degrees of the visual field, is the only part of the retina that is genuinely useful for reading. When foveal information is lacking, whether due to a retinal lesion, to a stroke having destroyed the central part of the visual cortex, or to an experimental trick that selectively blocks visual inputs to the fovea, reading becomes impossible."The need to bring words into the fovea explains why our eyes are in constant motion when we read. By orienting our gaze, we "scan" text with the most sensitive part of our vision, the only one that has the resolution needed to determine letters. However, oureyesdo not travel continuously across the page. Quite the opposite: they move in small steps called saccades. At this very moment, you are making four or five of these jerky movements every second, in order to bring new information to your fovea. Even within the fovea, visual information is not represented with the same precision at all points. In the retina as well as in the subsequent visual relays of the thalamus and of the cortex, the number of cells allocated to a given portion of the visual scene decreases progressively as one moves away from the center of gaze. This causes a gradual loss of visual precision. Visual accuracy is optimal at the center and smoothly decreases toward the periphery. We have the illusion of seeing the whole scene in front of us with the same fixed accuracy, as if it were filmed by a digital camera with a homogeneous array of pixels. However, unlike the camera, our eye sensor accurately perceives only the precise point where our gaze happens to land. The surroundings are lost in an increasingly hazy blurrinessOne might think that, under these conditions, it is the absolute size of printed characters that determines the ease with which we can read: small letters should be harder to read than larger ones. Oddly enough, however, this is not the case. The reason is that the larger the characters, the more room they use on the retina. When a whole word is printed in larger letters, it moves into the periphery of the retina, where even large letters are hard to discern. The two factors compensate for each other almost exactly, so that an enormous word and a minuscule one are essentially equivalent from the point of view of retinal precision. Of course, this is only true provided that the size of the characters remains larger than an absolute minimum, which corresponds to the maximal precision attained at the center of our fovea. When visual acuity is diminished, for instance in aging patients, it is quite logical to recommend books in large print .Our eyes impose a lot of constraints on the act of reading. The structure of our visual sensors forces us to scan the page by jerking our eyes around every two or three tenths of a second Reading is nothing but the word-by-word mental restitution of a text through a series of snapshots. file some small grammatical words like "the," "it or "is" can sometimes be skipped, almost all content words such as nouns and verbs have to be fixated at least once.These constraints are an integral part of our visual apparatus and cannot be lifted by training. One can certainly teach people to optimize their eye movements patterns, but most good readers, who read four hundred words per minute, are already close to optimal. Given the retinal sensor at our disposal, it is probably not possible to do much better. A simple demonstration proves that eye movements are the rate-limiting step in reading. If a full sentence is presented, word by word, at the precise point where gaze is focalized, thus avoiding the need for eye movements, a good reader can read five hundred words per minute at staggering speed-a mean of eight hundred words per minute, and up to sixteen hundred words per minute for the best readers, is about one word every forty milliseconds and three to four times faster than normal reading! With this method, called rapid sequential visual presentation, or RSVP, identification and comprehension remain satisfactory, thus suggesting that the duration of those central steps does not impose a strong constraint on normal reading. Perhaps this computerized presentation mode represents the future of reading in a world where screens progressively replace paper.At any rate, as long as text is presented in pages and lines, acquisition through gaze will slow reading and impose an unavoidable limitation. Thus, fast reading methods that advertise gains in reading speed of up to one thousand words per minute or more must be viewed with skepticism. One can no doubt broaden ones visual span somewhat, in order to reduce the number of saccades per line, and it is also possible to learn to avoid moments of regression, where gaze backtracks to the words it has just read. However, the physical limits of the eyes cannot be overcome, unless one is willing to skip words and thus run the risk of a misunderstanding. Woody Allen described this situation perfectly: "I took a speed-reading course and was able to readWar and Peacein twenty minutes. It involves Russia."Q.Why does the author recommend books in larger print for old people?

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Children today can access media through both traditional devices, like televisions, and portable devices like laptops and tablets. With more access, children are more likely to be exposed to violent content - like real-life or cartoons where force is being used and harm is being done to a person or character. Studies show that 37% of media aimed at children have scenes of physical or verbal violence. What's more, 90% of movies, 68% of video games, 60% of TV shows, and 15% of music videos have some form of violence. In some cases, it's rising - the amount of violence in mainstream movies has been growing steadily over the past 50 years. Evidence shows that this can be detrimental to young children. Around the ages of three and four children begin to develop perceptions and expectations about the world around them. These views are strongly influenced by their daily experiences. If children are often exposed to scenes of violence, they may develop a view of the world as a more dangerous place than it actually is. To investigate this further and predict the types of mental health outcomes this has, my colleagues and I examined the potential long-term risks associated with exposure to violent media on children's development. We found that those exposed to violence become more antisocial and emotionally distressed. Through parent reports, we measured children's exposure to violent movies and programmes in 1,800 preschool aged children between the ages of three and four. Four years later, second grade teachers rated the same children's classroom behaviour using a social behaviour questionnaire - which covers behaviour such as physical aggression, inattentiveness and emotional distress over the course of the school year. Teachers were unaware of which children had been exposed to violent media. To rule out the impact of the home environment on the development of these behaviours, we controlled for the contribution of early childhood aggression, parenting quality, maternal education, parent antisocial behaviour and family structure. According to our results, teachers rated exposed children as more antisocial. Antisocial behaviours include; a lack of remorse, lying, insensitivity to the emotions of others, and manipulating others. Our results also reveal significant associations between exposure to violent media and classroom attention problems. Furthermore, exposed children were reported to show more signs of emotional distress; in terms of sadness and a lack of enthusiasm. The results were similar for boys and girls. The content of media to which young children are exposed is closely related to child outcomes. Age-appropriate programmes - like Sesame Street for kindergarteners - which aim to help children understand words or ideas, are known to help them develop language and mental skills.According to the passage, why were teachers made part of the experiment?

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Children today can access media through both traditional devices, like televisions, and portable devices like laptops and tablets. With more access, children are more likely to be exposed to violent content - like real-life or cartoons where force is being used and harm is being done to a person or character. Studies show that 37% of media aimed at children have scenes of physical or verbal violence. What's more, 90% of movies, 68% of video games, 60% of TV shows, and 15% of music videos have some form of violence. In some cases, it's rising - the amount of violence in mainstream movies has been growing steadily over the past 50 years. Evidence shows that this can be detrimental to young children. Around the ages of three and four children begin to develop perceptions and expectations about the world around them. These views are strongly influenced by their daily experiences. If children are often exposed to scenes of violence, they may develop a view of the world as a more dangerous place than it actually is. To investigate this further and predict the types of mental health outcomes this has, my colleagues and I examined the potential long-term risks associated with exposure to violent media on children's development. We found that those exposed to violence become more antisocial and emotionally distressed. Through parent reports, we measured children's exposure to violent movies and programmes in 1,800 preschool aged children between the ages of three and four. Four years later, second grade teachers rated the same children's classroom behaviour using a social behaviour questionnaire - which covers behaviour such as physical aggression, inattentiveness and emotional distress over the course of the school year. Teachers were unaware of which children had been exposed to violent media. To rule out the impact of the home environment on the development of these behaviours, we controlled for the contribution of early childhood aggression, parenting quality, maternal education, parent antisocial behaviour and family structure. According to our results, teachers rated exposed children as more antisocial. Antisocial behaviours include; a lack of remorse, lying, insensitivity to the emotions of others, and manipulating others. Our results also reveal significant associations between exposure to violent media and classroom attention problems. Furthermore, exposed children were reported to show more signs of emotional distress; in terms of sadness and a lack of enthusiasm. The results were similar for boys and girls. The content of media to which young children are exposed is closely related to child outcomes. Age-appropriate programmes - like Sesame Street for kindergarteners - which aim to help children understand words or ideas, are known to help them develop language and mental skills.Which of the following words will be the closest synonym of 'detrimental', as used in the passage?

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Three children were fighting over a stick of length 60 metres. They ended up breaking the stick into three parts. The first part was five times the second part, and the last part was 17 metres smaller than the first part. What was the length (in m) of the largest part?Correct answer is '35'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup