CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful ...
Start Learning for Free
Principle : Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.
Facts : Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?
- a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.
- b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.
- c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.
- d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in ...
In the present case, the contract is void as the consideration of the same i.e. murdering of Preity is unlawful. No obligations arise out of a void contract.
Section 24 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that a contract whose object or consideration is unlawful is void.
Section 24 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that a contract whose object or consideration is unlawful is void.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all CLAT courses
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in ...
Since consideration of above stated contact is unlawful (murdering anyone) .therefore the contract is void
option A is correct
option A is correct
Community Answer
Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in ...
Answer:
Principle: Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.
Facts: Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return for the murder.
Explanation:
The given scenario involves a contract where Gagan has hired Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity, in exchange for a payment of Rs. 5 lakhs. However, this contract is clearly against the law and public policy, as it involves an illegal act of taking someone's life.
Void Contract:
- According to the principle, any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.
- In this case, the consideration for the contract is the murder of Preity, which is clearly an unlawful act.
- Therefore, the contract between Gagan and Nikhil is void.
Consequences of Void Contract:
- A void contract is not enforceable by law, and it cannot create any legal rights or obligations between the parties.
- Since the contract is void, neither Gagan nor Nikhil can legally enforce its terms.
- Gagan cannot compel Nikhil to perform the act of murdering Preity, and Nikhil cannot demand the payment of Rs. 5 lakhs from Gagan.
Conclusion:
Based on the principle and the given facts, it can be concluded that the contract between Gagan and Nikhil is void due to an unlawful consideration. Therefore, option 'A' is the correct answer.
Principle: Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.
Facts: Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return for the murder.
Explanation:
The given scenario involves a contract where Gagan has hired Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity, in exchange for a payment of Rs. 5 lakhs. However, this contract is clearly against the law and public policy, as it involves an illegal act of taking someone's life.
Void Contract:
- According to the principle, any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.
- In this case, the consideration for the contract is the murder of Preity, which is clearly an unlawful act.
- Therefore, the contract between Gagan and Nikhil is void.
Consequences of Void Contract:
- A void contract is not enforceable by law, and it cannot create any legal rights or obligations between the parties.
- Since the contract is void, neither Gagan nor Nikhil can legally enforce its terms.
- Gagan cannot compel Nikhil to perform the act of murdering Preity, and Nikhil cannot demand the payment of Rs. 5 lakhs from Gagan.
Conclusion:
Based on the principle and the given facts, it can be concluded that the contract between Gagan and Nikhil is void due to an unlawful consideration. Therefore, option 'A' is the correct answer.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle :Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law.Facts :Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?a)The contract is void due to unlawful consideration.b)The contract is voidable at the option of Nikhil due to the risk involved in it.c)The contract is valid and Nikhil must perform the act of murdering Preity.d)The contract is uncertain as the manner of murdering Preity is not specified in it.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup