CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Arge... Start Learning for Free
Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.
Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.
Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.
Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.
Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?
  • a)
    Lionel is optimistic about the future.
  • b)
    Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.
  • c)
    Diego views the present positively.
  • d)
    Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo:...
Alfredo talks about Argentina being a football powerhouse in the past whereas Diego talks about the team being a powerhouse in the present.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo:...
Introduction:
The conversation between Alfredo, Diego, and Lionel revolves around the topic of Argentinean football. Each person expresses their opinion about the current and future state of Argentinean football. From this conversation, certain inferences can be made about the perspectives and attitudes of the individuals involved.

Analysis:
Let's analyze each statement individually to determine the inferences that can be made from them.

Alfredo's Statement:
Alfredo states, "Argentina was a football powerhouse." This statement implies that Alfredo believes Argentina was a dominant force in football in the past. However, it does not provide any information about his views on the present or future state of Argentinean football.

Diego's Statement:
Diego states, "Argentina is a football powerhouse." This statement suggests that Diego considers Argentina to be a strong force in football at present. It indicates his positive view of the current state of Argentinean football.

Lionel's Statement:
Lionel states, "Argentina will be a football powerhouse." This statement implies Lionel's optimism about the future of Argentinean football. He believes that Argentina will regain its status as a dominant force in football.

Inferred Statements:
Based on the information provided, we can make the following inferences:

a) Lionel is optimistic about the future:
Lionel's statement clearly indicates his optimism about the future of Argentinean football. He believes that Argentina will become a football powerhouse once again.

b) Alfredo, Diego, and Lionel may disagree on certain things:
Although all three individuals express their opinions about Argentinean football, their statements do not provide enough information to determine whether they agree or disagree on specific aspects. Therefore, it can be inferred that they may have differing viewpoints.

c) Diego views the present positively:
Diego's statement suggests that he has a positive view of the present state of Argentinean football. He considers Argentina to be a football powerhouse at the current time.

d) Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego:
There is no evidence in the conversation to suggest that Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego. While Alfredo's statement focuses on the past, it does not contradict or invalidate Diego's statement about the present. Therefore, it cannot be inferred that Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, from the conversation between Alfredo, Diego, and Lionel, it can be inferred that Lionel is optimistic about the future of Argentinean football, Alfredo, Diego, and Lionel may have differing viewpoints, Diego views the present positively, but it cannot be inferred that Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego based on the provided information.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The Supreme Court clearance for the Central Vista redevelopment project that will give the country a new Parliament complex marks a big win for the government. Yet citizens will have little to cheer about the peremptory manner in which the project was cleared. Government had pitched the redevelopment citing the inadequacies of the current Parliament building and many of the “Bhawans” housing central ministries. This has failed to convince heritage conservationists and transparency activists. They are upset over the short shrift given to public consultations and in their words, the government’s tendency for “rule by law rather than rule of law”.Both the majority and dissenting verdicts refused, rightly, to get drawn into non-justiciable arguments like the rationale for displacing Parliament from its current complex or the aesthetics and undesirability of redevelopment in a heritage zone and the irrevocable harm done to heritage buildings and overall architectural harmony of the area. Yet the fact that these arguments come up before a constitutional court is a reflection of governmental failure to meaningfully engage with the public at the project’s commencement.Modes like discussion by both Houses of Parliament and public hearings could have helped the government persuade concerned citizens. In the end, government’s executive prerogative must prevail, but not without it having invested significant effort in due process and consensus. After all, at stake is the future of a building with an extraordinary past. This is where the Constitution was adopted besides serving as the “temple of democracy” for several decades. Countries with storied histories are known to proudly showcase their key institutions of democracy to highlight antiquity and unbroken tradition. No less contestable is proceeding with expensive redevelopment plans during an economic crisis, which offered excuses for cutting MPLADS funds and GST compensation that act as beneficial capital transfers to the grassroots.While both judgments did highlight the importance of transparency, public consultations and environmental protection, the minority verdict goes further. It quashed the land use change and directed the central authority to put all drawings, layout plans and explanatory memoranda on its website, invite suggestions and objections, and conduct public hearings before the Heritage Conservation Committee ahead of granting permissions in accordance with the law. Liberties taken with democratic due process, even if not found to be justiciable in courts, rarely augur well in the long run. The ongoing farmers’ agitation also drives home the merits of greater public consultation.Q. What is the basic nature of the passage?

Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The humanities transmit, through time and across cultures, diverse expressions of the human condition, allowing us to contextualize, illuminate, and pass on an essential legacy of culture, history and heritage.I believe that social media poses a grave threat to the humanities because it lacks the depth, nuance and permanence that make genuine, meaningful interactions about the human condition possible.Everything that social media communication represents- immediacy, impermanence, collectivism- is contrary and harmful to the thoughtfulness, permanence and individualistic experiences necessary to humanities discourse. Social media is creating a hive mind, a group think that devalues the human condition in favor of the immediate, the marketable and the shallow. In social media, there is no difference between us and others; we look the same, we talk the same, we fill the same space. The real purpose of social media is to gauge measure and ultimately control the behavior of the crowd for marketing purposes. And as social media, and its values of pliable, identifiable collectives based on mutual interests, migrates from the Web to become more ubiquitous in our everyday lives--try attending a movie or buying a meal, the reductionist conversation that it engenders comes with it.The first negative impact that social media has on the humanities is a multiple-choice format and physical structure that allows only for a very limited, narrow type of communication. There is no room for individual creativity or representation. Humanities also require background and context to impart ideas but social media is an equivalency and framework vacuum that decontextualizes and trivializes information in a way that renders it nearly meaningless. The brevity of communication through social media precludes explanation and circumstance.Within social media, all information is equally important. There are no little or big facts; all data is expressed in compact bites of equal weight. The inability to separate the trivial from the significant leaves us unable to glean consequential substance from what we are saying to each other: the very purpose of the humanities.Lastly, social media creates and archives no history. The humanities are about expanding, describing, understanding and transmitting through the generations, the human condition. The purpose of social media is to understand ever larger groups of people at the expense of the individual. Humanities is exactly the opposite: understanding the individual for the sake of the masses.As human beings, our only real method of connection is through authentic communication. Studies show that only 7% of communication is based on the written or verbal word. A whopping 93% is based on nonverbal body language. This is where social media gets dicey. Every relevant metric shows that we are interacting at breakneck speed and frequency through social media. But are we really communicating? With 93% of our communication context stripped away, we are now attempting to forge relationships and make decisions based on phrases, Abbreviations, Snippets, Emoticons, and which may or may not be accurate representations of the truth. In an ironic twist, social media has the potential to make us less social; a surrogate for the real thing. For it to be a truly effective communication vehicle, all parties bear a responsibility to be genuine, accurate, and not allow it to replace human contact altogether. In the workplace, the use of electronic communication has overtaken face-to-face and voice-to-voice communication by a wide margin. With these two trends at play, leaders must consider the impact on business relationships and the ability to effectively collaborate, build trust, and create employee engagement and loyalty.Q.What does the author mean by ‘reductionist conversation’?

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.That Minnu Mani, a 23-year-old from the Kurichiya tribe in Kerala, secured a contract in the Women’s Premier League auction is both heart-warming and a reminder. Minnu’s success is a rare story for India’s tribal communities. Sports has discovered some talent among tribals and politics has embraced a few. But data tells the real story. The recently released Tribal Development Report 2022 by Bharat Rural Livelihoods Foundation provides damning statistics. They are 8.6% of the population, and they fare considerably worse than others when it comes to access to sanitation, drinking water, education and proper nutrition.The report also says that tribal communities have been pushed farther away from alluvial plains and fertile river basins over the decades, which has had a direct impact on their livelihood. Of the 257 Scheduled Tribe districts in the country, 230 or 90% are in either forested or hilly or dry areas. And past policies like the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 illogically pitted the imperatives of environment protection against the needs of Adivasi communities.While that approach has been modified and today Adivasis are seen as important stakeholders in forest conservation, on-ground contestations continue. Last year’s amendments to the Forest Conservation Rules have been protested by tribal communities on the ground that they undermine the rights of tribes and forest dwellers over forest resources as envisioned in the Forest Rights Act, 2009. Adivasi activists say the changes make it easier for businesses to divert forest land and make obtaining clearances by commercial entities easier. If true, these provisions have serious implications for tribal welfare.It’s also true that there has been increasing political courting of tribal communities in recent years. From expanding ST status to new communities to the Adivasi vote becoming a sought-after electoral commodity to India getting its first tribal President in Droupadi Murmu, tribals have emerged as a serious political bloc. But their genuine empowerment will lie in creating opportunities. We need thousands more Minnu Manis and Droupadi Murmus.Q.What is the tone of the passage?

Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Alfredo, Diego and Lionel are discussing Argentinean football.Alfredo: Argentina was a football powerhouse.Diego: Argentina is a football powerhouse.Lionel: Argentina will be a football powerhouse.Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above conversation?a)Lionel is optimistic about the future.b)Alfredo, Diego and Lionel may disagree on certain things.c)Diego views the present positively.d)Alfredo completely disagrees with Diego.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev