The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the li...

The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.

Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?

a)
One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.
b)
Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.
c)
Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.
d)
The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1...

The information talks about a rise/fall in literacy rate in and around 3 years: 1991, 2001 and 2006. It talks about a rise in literacy rate from 1991 to 2006 with a fall in the rate according to the 2001 census. A refutable statement to this is option (D) which talks about a larger drop in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 than a rise in the rate from 2001 to 2006 (which does not indicate progress from 1991 to 2006 as mentioned in the statement. The other options do not refute the statement as strongly as option (D).

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Life expectancy in India has more than doubled since Independence - from around 32 years in the late 1940s to 70 years or so today. Many countries have done even better, but this is still a historical achievement. Over the same period, the fertility rate has crashed, thus liberating women from the shackles of repeated child-bearing and child care. All this is good news, but it also creates a new challenge - the ageing of the population. The share of the elderly (persons aged 60 years and abov e) in India's population, close to 9% in 2011, is growing fast and may reach 18% by 2036 according to the National Commission on Population. If India is to ensure a decent quality of life for the elderly in the near future, planning and providing for it must begin today. India has important schemes of non-contributory pensions for the elderly, widowed women, and disabled persons under the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP). Alas, eligibility for NSAP is restricted to below poverty line (BPL) families, based on outdated and unreliable BPL lists, some of which are 20 years old.[Source - The Hindu, September 15, 2022]Q. Consider the following statements and mark the correct option.Statement I: Pradhan Mantri Vaya Vandana Yojana (PMVVY) is a pension scheme for senior citizens aged 60 years and above.Statement II: Under the scheme, the pensioner will receive an assured return of 7.40% p.a. for the policy duration of 10 years.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Life expectancy in India has more than doubled since Independence - from around 32 years in the late 1940s to 70 years or so today. Many countries have done even better, but this is still a historical achievement. Over the same period, the fertility rate has crashed, thus liberating women from the shackles of repeated child-bearing and child care. All this is good news, but it also creates a new challenge - the ageing of the population. The share of the elderly (persons aged 60 years and abov e) in Indias population, close to 9% in 2011, is growing fast and may reach 18% by 2036 according to the National Commission on Population. If India is to ensure a decent quality of life for the elderly in the near future, planning and providing for it must begin today. India has important schemes of non-contributory pensions for the elderly, widowed women, and disabled persons under the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP). Alas, eligibility for NSAP is restricted to below poverty line (BPL) families, based on outdated and unreliable BPL lists, some of which are 20 years old.[Source - The Hindu, September 15, 2022]Q.Consider the following statements and mark the correct option.Statement I: Pradhan Mantri Vaya Vandana Yojana (PMVVY) is a pension scheme specifically crafted for individuals aged 60 years and above.Statement II: Within the framework of this scheme, pensioners are assured a fixed annual return of 7.40% throughout a 10-year policy period.

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.Sanjay Kothari, the Secretary to the President, has been selected as the new {X} by a high-powered committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an official said.Committee has also chosen former Information and Broadcasting Secretary Bimal Julka, currently serving as an Information Commissioner, as the new Chief Information Commissioner in the Central Information Commission.Sources said the recommendation for the appointment of Kothari and Julka, who are retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers, by a majority decision was opposed by Congress leader in the Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury. The selection panel also included Union Home Minister Amit Shah."Kothari and Julka have been selected as the next {X} and CIC," said a senior government official, who did not want to be named.The three-member panel also decided by majority the appointment of Suresh Patel as Vigilance Commissioner and Anita Pandove as Information Commissioner.Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said government should initiate a fresh process for appointing the next {X} by inviting applications again."We demand that the entire process be scrapped in its entirety and a de novo process started by inviting applications afresh. There needs to be proper application of mind," he told reporters.Manish Tewari claimed that it is clear that government has a lot to hide and wants the {X} to be a "rubber stamp".Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala also attacked government over the appointment of {X} and CIC and alleged there is no place for transparency, accountability and constitutional processes in Prime Minister Narendra Modis New India, which was fatal for democracy.He alleged that the appointments of {X} and CIC are being made arbitrarily on the lines of "khul ja sim sim" (open sesam e)."Arbitrariness in top judicial institutions is fatal for democracy," he said."The appointments of {X} and CIC are being made on the lines of open sesame. Bring out names from the pocket and make appointments, thats it. There is no place left for transparency, accountability, constitutional processes and compliance of law in Modi jis New India," he charged on Twitter.It is free of control from any executive authority and has the responsibility of monitoring all vigilance activities in the Central Government, besides advising various authorities in planning, executing, reviewing and reforming their vigilance work.The Central Information Commission was constituted under the {Y} Act and has the jurisdiction over all central public authorities.Q.Read the statements below and mark the correct option.Statement I: The Central Information Commission is a constitutional body.Statement II: Its members are appointed by the President of India.

View answer

Directions :Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate optionIn each of the questions, two statements are numbered as I and II. There may be a cause and effect relationship between the two statements. The statements may be the effect of the same cause or an independent cause. The statements may be independent causes without having any relationship.Read both the statements and mark your answer as:(

View answer

Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.Statement: The increase in adult literacy will lead to the country’s development and progress.Conclusions: I. Educated persons offer less resistance to new innovations.II. This country’s population is totally illiterate.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The 2001 census showed a sharp fall in the literacy rate compared to 1991, but an increase in the literacy rate by 2006 suggests that between 1991 and 2006 India progresses in terms of literacy rate.Which of the following statements, if true, best refutes the above argument?a)One of the causes of more literacy is the increased population growth rate.b)Although there was no census in 2006 the information about the literacy rate is reliable.c)Many of those who were illiterate in 2001 became literate by 2006.d)The rate of fall in literacy rate between 1991 and 2001 was more than the rate of rise in literacy rate between 2001 and 2006.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam