Question Description
This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.