CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  This is one of the unanswered questions that ... Start Learning for Free
This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.
Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.
II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.
III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.
IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.
  • a)
    I and II
  • b)
    I and IV
  • c)
    II and IV
  • d)
    I, II and III
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I beli...
Option 4 strengthens the statement that noise can contribute to various diseases in humans. Only option 4 supports this statement by providing an additional premise that supports the original claim in the passage that loud noise can lead to diseases.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I beli...
Understanding the Passage
The passage explores the concept of technological evolution and innovation, suggesting a deeper inquiry into how technologies develop over time.
Key Inferences
- I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.
The author does express interest in the nature of innovation, indicating that understanding evolution could lead to insights about innovation. However, the focus seems more on how technology evolves rather than solely on innovation itself.
- II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.
This inference is correct since the author explicitly discusses the idea of technological evolution and its relationship with innovation. The exploration of how technologies derive from one another aligns with this assertion.
- III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigate whether technology evolves at all.
The passage does not directly suggest that the author believes in the necessity of investigating the existence of technological evolution before theorizing about it. Therefore, this inference is not strongly supported.
- IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.
This is accurate as the author defines evolution in terms of common descent and relatedness among technologies, which is a central aspect of their argument.
Conclusion
The correct answer is option 'A' (I and II) because the author is primarily concerned with developing a theory of technological evolution and touches upon the implications for innovation. The emphasis on understanding the relationship between technologies supports this inference.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice This is one of the unanswered questions that I want to explore. I believe that this is certainly one of the deeper questions about technology. Why do I say so? Without evolution technologies seem to be born independently and improve independently. Each must come from some unexplained mental process, some form of creativity or thinking outside the box that brings it into existence and separately develops it. With evolution, new technologies would be birthed in some precise way from previous ones, albeit with considerable mid-wifing, and develop though some understood process of adaptation. In other words, if we could understand evolution, we could understand the most precious of processes: innovation. But, let me define evolution before I proceed further. The word evolution has two general meanings. One is the gradual development of something, as with the evolution of ballet or the English madrigal. The other is the process by which all objects of some class are related by ties of common descent from the collection of earlier objects. The latter is what I mean by evolution.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?I. The author’s main concern is to develop a theory of innovation.II. The author is interested in putting forth a theory of technological evolution.III. The author believes before developing a theory of technological evolution, one needs to investigated whether technology evolves at all.IV. Evolution, as the author puts it, is a sense of common relatedness.a)I and IIb)I and IVc)II and IVd)I, II and IIICorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev