GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV...
Start Learning for Free
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.
In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?
- a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.
- b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.
- c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.
- d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.
- e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting ...
The first thing that we should do is to define the argument, without which we cannot decide whether a BF is supporting or dismissing the argument.
The core argument finally is that the LV-426 is ripe to explode. "because it is now showing signs of turbulence" is the grounds on which this conclusion or argument is drawn.
However, look at E, The choice says that the info given in the second BF counters the argument. This is not so and is enough to eliminate the choice.
We must not be swayed by the fact that the first BF may be true. In BF, the premise and the inference should be congruous.
C. The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.
In C, the first BF does not talk anything about the recent occurrence of the turbulence. It only talks about the quiet period that prevailed earlier. The second provides a reason for the main conclusion of an imminent explosion that is likely to occur because of the newly observed turbulence.
The catch in C is that the first part is neutral. It neither contradicts nor supports the core conclusion.
The core argument finally is that the LV-426 is ripe to explode. "because it is now showing signs of turbulence" is the grounds on which this conclusion or argument is drawn.
However, look at E, The choice says that the info given in the second BF counters the argument. This is not so and is enough to eliminate the choice.
We must not be swayed by the fact that the first BF may be true. In BF, the premise and the inference should be congruous.
C. The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.
In C, the first BF does not talk anything about the recent occurrence of the turbulence. It only talks about the quiet period that prevailed earlier. The second provides a reason for the main conclusion of an imminent explosion that is likely to occur because of the newly observed turbulence.
The catch in C is that the first part is neutral. It neither contradicts nor supports the core conclusion.
Most Upvoted Answer
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting ...
The first thing that we should do is to define the argument, without which we cannot decide whether a BF is supporting or dismissing the argument.
The core argument finally is that the LV-426 is ripe to explode. "because it is now showing signs of turbulence" is the grounds on which this conclusion or argument is drawn.
However, look at E, The choice says that the info given in the second BF counters the argument. This is not so and is enough to eliminate the choice.
We must not be swayed by the fact that the first BF may be true. In BF, the premise and the inference should be congruous.
C. The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.
In C, the first BF does not talk anything about the recent occurrence of the turbulence. It only talks about the quiet period that prevailed earlier. The second provides a reason for the main conclusion of an imminent explosion that is likely to occur because of the newly observed turbulence.
The catch in C is that the first part is neutral. It neither contradicts nor supports the core conclusion.
The core argument finally is that the LV-426 is ripe to explode. "because it is now showing signs of turbulence" is the grounds on which this conclusion or argument is drawn.
However, look at E, The choice says that the info given in the second BF counters the argument. This is not so and is enough to eliminate the choice.
We must not be swayed by the fact that the first BF may be true. In BF, the premise and the inference should be congruous.
C. The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.
In C, the first BF does not talk anything about the recent occurrence of the turbulence. It only talks about the quiet period that prevailed earlier. The second provides a reason for the main conclusion of an imminent explosion that is likely to occur because of the newly observed turbulence.
The catch in C is that the first part is neutral. It neither contradicts nor supports the core conclusion.
Community Answer
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting ...
The first thing that we should do is to define the argument, without which we cannot decide whether a BF is supporting or dismissing the argument.
The core argument finally is that the LV-426 is ripe to explode. "because it is now showing signs of turbulence" is the grounds on which this conclusion or argument is drawn.
However, look at E, The choice says that the info given in the second BF counters the argument. This is not so and is enough to eliminate the choice.
We must not be swayed by the fact that the first BF may be true. In BF, the premise and the inference should be congruous.
C. The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.
In C, the first BF does not talk anything about the recent occurrence of the turbulence. It only talks about the quiet period that prevailed earlier. The second provides a reason for the main conclusion of an imminent explosion that is likely to occur because of the newly observed turbulence.
The catch in C is that the first part is neutral. It neither contradicts nor supports the core conclusion.
The core argument finally is that the LV-426 is ripe to explode. "because it is now showing signs of turbulence" is the grounds on which this conclusion or argument is drawn.
However, look at E, The choice says that the info given in the second BF counters the argument. This is not so and is enough to eliminate the choice.
We must not be swayed by the fact that the first BF may be true. In BF, the premise and the inference should be congruous.
C. The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.
In C, the first BF does not talk anything about the recent occurrence of the turbulence. It only talks about the quiet period that prevailed earlier. The second provides a reason for the main conclusion of an imminent explosion that is likely to occur because of the newly observed turbulence.
The catch in C is that the first part is neutral. It neither contradicts nor supports the core conclusion.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Astronomer: Among recently-observed stars, LV-426 has been exhibiting signs of turbulent activity. Prior to this observation, scientists speculated over whether LV-426 could become a supernova, but dismissed the possibility since the star was dormant for a prolonged period of time. It now seems likely that LV-426 will explode into a supernova, since turbulent surges of activity have been observed in every star that has transformed into a supernova.In the astronomer’s argument, which of the following roles do the boldfaced portions play?a)The first provides evidence for a prediction defended by the argument; the second is that prediction.b)The first describes a situation supporting a conclusion that is reevaluated by the argument; the second is a counterargument made by the author.c)The first describes an occurrence that does not contradict the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides the reason for that conclusion.d)The first gives information that supports an intermediate conclusion cited in the argument; the second states the reason for that conclusion.e)The first provides evidence in support of an observation that is dismissed in the argument; the second provides information that counters that observation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup