All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Read the passage and answer the question that... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Read the passage and answer the question that follows.
This year's Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.
LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.
The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.
Q. Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?
  • a)
    People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.
  • b)
    People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.
  • c)
    A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.
  • d)
    India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel...
Only option 3 best represents the main conclusion of the passage. Throughout the passage, the author highlights the various steps that must be taken by the government to make use of the invention that won a Nobel prize. Although option 4 is stated in the passage, it is not what the whole passage is about.
View all questions of this test
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?

Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens the authors argument that India can knock off about 15% of its consumption by using LEDs?

Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?

Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following is an assumption, on which the authors statement that placing bulk orders for LED lamps will reduce their costs, is based?

Since the late 1970’s, faced with severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the US have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. ##At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufacturers worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.When I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a “40, 40, 20” rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This does not mean cost-cutting should not be tried. Approaches like simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.Cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. An industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. Managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers. Successful companies have overcome this problem by developing and implementing a strategy that focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it clearly rests on a different way of managing.Q. As inferred from the first paragraph, the manufacturers expected that the measures they implemented would

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the given passage?a)People should not increase their usage of LEDs even after getting it a reduced price.b)People should provide LEDs to rural areas free of cost.c)A lot can be done to achieve the goal of electrification by making use of the Nobel-prize bagging invention.d)India should push up the growth of its LED-manufacturing industry by providing subsidies.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup