Question Description
Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the passage and answer the question that follows.This years Nobel prize for physics has gone to three Japanese scientists who developed a light emitting diode (LED) capable of producing bright blue light. This invention has revolutionised lighting. India should fully adopt this revolution, replace all other sources of lighting with LEDs, knock about 15% off its consumption of electricity, take due credit for climate change efforts and, in the process, improve the lot of millions of people in rural India. India can also try to accelerate the growth of an LED lamp-producing industry in the country.LEDs do not contain mercury and last very, very long. They can be used in arrays of variable size, and these arrays can be used for every possible use of light: from mood lighting to stadium floodlights. India uses about 16% of its power consumption for lighting. If LEDs were to replace other light sources, and people not encouraged to increase the use of lighting because of lower power costs, this proportion can be cut by 75%. The power that would be saved would be equivalent to that of over 15% of generation capacity, given that 30% of the power generated is lost.The ongoing rural electrification campaign can place bulk orders for LED lamps to reduce their costs and incentivise local manufacture. All freshly electrified villages should use only LEDs for lighting. Some of the gains to the grid from avoided consumption by conventional lamps can be used to subsidise LEDs for consumers. Financing schemes can be worked out to mitigate the higher capital outlays required on LEDs. All this is doable, provided we summon the political will to deploy Nobel-blessed lighting for the masses.Q.What role does the authors claim that replacement of the current light sources with LEDs and encouraging its use will reduce power consumption in India play in the argument in the passage?a)It is the conclusion that the author draws based on the consumption patterns of people in India.b)It supports the authors conclusion as to why people should avoid the use of LED lights for a long time.c)It contradicts the claim that people in India have an aversion to use the LEDs for lighting their homes.d)It supports the authors conclusion as to why the use of LEDs in India will be beneficial in the long run.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.