Question Description
Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.In September 2019, the Supreme Court described {X} as a "shining example"with a Uniform Civil Code, and observed that the founders of the Constitution had "hoped and expected" a Uniform Civil Code for India but there has been no attempt at framing one.A Uniform Civil Code is one that would provide for one law for the entire country, applicable to all religious communities in their personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. {Y} of the Constitution lays down that the state shall endeavour to secure a Uniform Civil Code for the citizens throughout the territory of India.{Y} is one of the directive principles. These, as defined in Article 37, are not justifiable (not enforceable by any court) but the principles laid down therein are fundamental in governance. Fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law. While {Y} uses the words "state shall endeavour", other Articles in the Directive Principles chapter use words such as "in particular strive"; "shall in particular direct its policy"; "shall be obligation of the state", etc. Article 43 mentions "state shall endeavour by suitable legislation", while the phrase "by suitable legislation" is absent in {Y}. All this implies that the duty of the state is greater in other directive principles than in {Y}.There is no doubt that fundamental rights are more important. The Supreme Court held in Minerva Mills (1980): "Indian Constitution is founded on the bed-rock of the balance between Parts III (Fundamental Rights) and IV (Directive Principles). To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to disturb the harmony of the Constitution". Article 31C inserted by the 42ndAmendment in 1976, however, lays down that if a law is made to implement any directive principle, it cannot be challenged on the ground of being violative of the fundamental rights under Articles 14{1} and 19.Indian laws do follow a uniform code in most civil matters – however, they have made hundreds of amendments and therefore in certain matters, there is diversity even under these secular civil laws. Recently, several states refused to be governed by the uniform Motor Vehicles Act, 2019.If the framers of the Constitution had intended to have a Uniform Civil Code, they would have given exclusive jurisdiction to Parliament in respect of personal laws, by including this subject in the Union List. But "personal laws" are mentioned in the Concurrent List. Last year, the Law Commission concluded that a Uniform Civil Code is neither feasible nor desirable.Q."Directive Principles of State Policy" is a borrowed feature of which countrys Constitution?a)Britainb)Irelandc)The United States of Americad)AustraliaCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.