CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions:The question is based on the reaso... Start Learning for Free
Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.
The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as 'Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together'.
In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.
While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.
There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.
In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that 'The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. That's why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.
Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.
Q. What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?
  • a)
    Penalty for abetment to murder
  • b)
    6 months
  • c)
    Life imprisonment
  • d)
    Penalty for conspiracy
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or fa...
Penalty given to conspirators who conspired to do an act punishable with life imprisonment will be awarded the penalty of abetment to the offence conspired to do.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly has recently passed the Andhra Pradesh Disha Bill, 2019 (now, Andhra Pradesh Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2019).Disha is the name given to the veterinarian who was raped and murdered in Hyderabad on 27 November, 2019, sparked an outrage across country.It envisages the completion of investigation in 7 days and trial in 14 working days, where there is adequate conclusive evidence, and reducing total judgment time to 21 days from existing 4 months.The Act also prescribes death penalty for rape crimes where there is adequate conclusive evidence and this provision is given by amending Section 376 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860.In cases of harassment of women through social/digital media, the Act states 2 years imprisonment for first conviction and 4 years imprisonment for second as well as subsequent convictions. As per Section 354D of IPC, stalking is continuously following a woman or contacting her either online or in person, where she has clearly shown she doesnt want the attention. The section makes an exception, if a person is stalking a woman as part of a legal duty to do so.A new Section 354 E will be added in IPC, 1860. It also prescribes life imprisonment for other sexual offences against children and for this purpose includes Section 354 F and 354 G in IPC. The Andhra Pradesh government will now establish, operate and maintain a register in electronic form, to be called Women & Children Offenders Registry. This registry will be made public and will also be available to countrys law enforcement agencies.The state government will also establish exclusive special courts in each district to ensure speedy trial. These courts will exclusively deal with cases of offences against women and children including rape, sexual harassment, acid attacks, social media harassment of women, stalking, voyeurism and all cases under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.Moreover, the government will also appoint a special public prosecutor for each exclusive special court. The government will constitute special police teams at district level to be called District Special Police Team. It will be headed by DSP for investigation of offences related to women and children.Q.Naman is a police officer who is tracking down an arms shipment and has been monitoring Shrutis emails, phone messages and her Whatsapp messages. Naman has been keeping an eye on Shruti for a month. On knowing this fact, Shruti filed a complaint against Naman under Section 354 D of IPC. Naman was sentenced 2 years imprisonment for being the first case of stalking from Shruti. Is the sentence valid?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Solitary confinement is a kind of punishment which secludes the prisoner from any intercourse of sight of and communication with other prisoner ,it may be accompanied with or without labour . In leading case of Kishore Singh V. State Of Rajasthan it was held by SC that solitary confinement is a type of imprisonment in which there is complete isolation of prisoner from the co prisoner and segregation from outside world and fellow prisoner. Whenever any person is convicted of an offence for which under this code the court has power to sentence him to rigorous imprisonment , the court may, by its sentence , order that the offender shall be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of the imprisonment to which he is sentenced , not exceeding three months in the whole, according to the following scale , that is say: A time not exceeding one month if the term of imprisonment shall not exceed six months; A time not exceeding two months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed six months and [shall not exceed one] year; A time not exceeding three months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed one year.Q.An individual is found guilty of a major offense and given a five-year hard jail sentence. Three months of solitary confinement are specified by the court as part of the sentence. For a serious offense, can the court impose a five-year sentence that includes three months of solitary confinement?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Solitary confinement is a kind of punishment which secludes the prisoner from any intercourse of sight of and communication with other prisoners, it may be accompanied with or without labor. In leading case of Kishore Singh V. State Of Rajasthan it was held by SC that solitary confinement is a type of imprisonment in which there is complete isolation of prisoner from the co prisoner and segregation from outside world and fellow prisoner. Whenever any person is convicted of an offence for which under this code the court has power to sentence him to rigorous imprisonment, the court may, by its sentence , order that the offender shall be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of the imprisonment to which he is sentenced, not exceeding three months in the whole, according to the following scale, that is say: A time not exceeding one month if the term of imprisonment shall not exceed six months; A time not exceeding two months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed six months and [shall not exceed one] year; A time not exceeding three months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed one year.Q.The court condemns the convicted party to three years of harsh imprisonment in a case involving a serious offense. The judge stipulates that the sentence will include one month of solitary detention. Is it legal for the judge to include one month of solitary confinement in the three-year sentence?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The most famous type of conspiracy is criminal conspiracy. Generally, the act of Criminal Conspiracy is defined as Two, or more than two people agreeing to do an illegal act or offense together.In India, historically the act of conspiracy was considered as a civil wrong but later on, it was brought under the purview of the Indian Penal Code. In the amendment to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the year 1913, Sections 120A and 120B were added to include the act of conspiracy as a criminal offence. Section 120A of the IPC states the definition of a criminal conspiracy. It states that when two or more than two people are involved and agree upon to do an illegal act or to do such an act which is legal by illegal means, i.e the legality of the means is the main issue are said to be involved in a criminal conspiracy.While Section 120B of the IPC defines and establishes the punishments to be inflicted for the act of conspiracy. It states that: Persons who are involved in the conspiracy of such an act, which amounts to the punishment of a death sentence or life imprisonment, then the punishment for such an act of conspiracy would be given according to the punishment for abetment of the same act. Except for the aforesaid acts of conspiracy, every other act of conspiracy would be punishable for an imprisonment term of 6 months or fine or both.There exist essential ingredients for an act to constitute Criminal Conspiracy. Firstly, the same should take place for an illegal end to be accomplished. There should be concrete planning for accomplishing that object. The conspirators shall make an agreement to cooperate with each other. However, one must not confuse between the degree of the conspiracy of an act and committing the act itself.In the case of Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail this distinction was clearly explained and defined, wherein court observed that The act of conspiring for a crime is totally different than committing the offense itself because the phase of conspiracy comes before the phase of committing a crime. The commission of conspiracy is completed before the crime is commissioned. Thats why it should be treated differently as a distinct crime.Another essential of conspiracy under torts is that some overt act must be done by the defendants which causes harm to some other person. It is not necessary that the whole conspiracy must be carried out in the form of action. A single step towards the commission of the conspiracy may amount to the offence. For the overt act to be considered as essential, it is necessary that one of the contributors have acted for the fulfillment of the intention behind the conspiracy.Q.What would be the penalty awarded to the conspirators of murder, if murder is punishable with life imprisonment?a)Penalty for abetment to murderb)6 monthsc)Life imprisonmentd)Penalty for conspiracyCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev