Question Description
Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions:The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The mere fact that if a married woman commits suicide within a period of seven years of her marriage, the presumption under Section 113 A of the Evidence Act would not automatically apply. The legislative mandate is that where a woman commits suicide within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that her husband or any relative of her husband has subjected her to cruelty, the provision under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code may attract, having regard to all other circumstances of the case, when such suicide has been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.Q.The husband had been on the receiving end of his wifes abuse since marriage. Within just one year of marriage, he committed suicide. His parents are aggrieved and wish to file a complaint under Section 498A. Is it valid?a)Yes, as it was within seven years.b)It is not an offence, so the suit is not valid.c)Yes, as it led to suicide and his parents filed the suit.d)No, only the wifes parents can file a suit.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.