All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  For which of the following can special provis... Start Learning for Free
For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?

1. Women and children

2. Scheduled Tribes

3. Economically backward classes

4. Scheduled Castes

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

  • a)
    1, 2, 3 and 4

  • b)
    1 and 3

  • c)
    2, 3 and 4

  • d)
    1, 2 and 4

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
For which of the following can special provisions be made under Articl...
Article 15 of the Constitution of India prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It provides for special provisions to be made for the advancement of certain sections of society. The following are the provisions that can be made under Article 15:

Provisions for Women and Children
Women and children have been given special provisions under Article 15(3) of the Constitution. The State can make special provisions for the protection of women and children. This provision enables the state to make laws for the protection of women and children from social, economic, and political exploitation.

Provisions for Scheduled Tribes
Scheduled Tribes have been given special provisions under Article 15(4) of the Constitution. The State can make special provisions for the advancement of Scheduled Tribes. This provision enables the state to make laws for the economic, social, and educational upliftment of Scheduled Tribes.

Provisions for Economically Backward Classes
Economically Backward Classes have been given special provisions under Article 15(5) of the Constitution. The State can make special provisions for the advancement of Economically Backward Classes. This provision enables the state to make laws for the economic and educational upliftment of Economically Backward Classes.

Provisions for Scheduled Castes
Scheduled Castes have been given special provisions under Article 15(4) of the Constitution. The State can make special provisions for the advancement of Scheduled Castes. This provision enables the state to make laws for the economic, social, and educational upliftment of Scheduled Castes.

Conclusion
Thus, it can be concluded that special provisions can be made for women and children, Scheduled Tribes, Economically Backward Classes, and Scheduled Castes under Article 15 of the Constitution. These provisions enable the state to make laws for the upliftment and advancement of these sections of society.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
For which of the following can special provisions be made under Articl...
Under article 15 the constitution doesnot mention about the economically backward classes however by the amendment bill passed in 2019 introducing Reservations for EWS is mentioned under clause 6 of article 15
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

On February 10, the Supreme Court (SC) issued a notice to prohibit children from entering the areas where Anti – CAA protests were held. The notice was issued in a matter where the SC took suo moto cognisance of the involvement of children in protests in a letter addressing the death of a four-month-old. This order violates children’s right to protest. Article 19 of the Indian Constitution protects the right to protest. This right reasonably extends to children. According to Article 19(2), the right to protest can be restricted for various reasons, including protecting the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality. Considering the fact that the children were protesting peacefully and for legitimate reasons, the restriction on their right to protest does not fall under any of the possible basis in Article 19(2).Another right engaged by this restriction is children’s right to education and development. In Unnikrishnan v State of A.P., the SC held that Article 21 includes the protection of children’s right to educational opportunities and facilities for children to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity. This arguably encompasses their rights to protest and freedom of expression. Preventing children from expressing their opinions compromises the freedom to express their opinions and arguably curtails their right to develop in conditions of freedom and dignity. The jurisprudence of Indian courts has not had an opportunity to set out the scope of the rights to protest and expression in the context of children.Under international law, Article 13 of the UNCRC, ratified by India in 1992, provides that children have the right to freedom of expression, this includes, “freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds”. Further, Article 15 of the UNCRC protects children’s freedom to associate and peaceful assembly. These rights can only be restricted by provisions which are ‘necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order, the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.’ There may be reasons to restrict the presence of very young and unsupervised children at protests. However, the court’s order arbitrarily banned all children from the Shaheen-Bagh protest site, irrespective of their age and for an indefinite period. This wide ban is arbitrary and a manifestly disproportionate tool for realising any laudable aims under the Indian Constitution and in international law. In addition to violating children’s right to protest, the order also limits the participation of parents and other child caregivers. This will have a disproportionate impact on women as they bear the larger share of child care, limiting their right to freedom of expression and protest.Which of the following is the major disagreement of the author with the Supreme Court judgment?

On February 10, the Supreme Court (SC) issued a notice to prohibit children from entering the areas where Anti – CAA protests were held. The notice was issued in a matter where the SC took suo moto cognisance of the involvement of children in protests in a letter addressing the death of a four-month-old. This order violates children’s right to protest. Article 19 of the Indian Constitution protects the right to protest. This right reasonably extends to children. According to Article 19(2), the right to protest can be restricted for various reasons, including protecting the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality. Considering the fact that the children were protesting peacefully and for legitimate reasons, the restriction on their right to protest does not fall under any of the possible basis in Article 19(2).Another right engaged by this restriction is children’s right to education and development. In Unnikrishnan v State of A.P., the SC held that Article 21 includes the protection of children’s right to educational opportunities and facilities for children to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity. This arguably encompasses their rights to protest and freedom of expression. Preventing children from expressing their opinions compromises the freedom to express their opinions and arguably curtails their right to develop in conditions of freedom and dignity. The jurisprudence of Indian courts has not had an opportunity to set out the scope of the rights to protest and expression in the context of children.Under international law, Article 13 of the UNCRC, ratified by India in 1992, provides that children have the right to freedom of expression, this includes, “freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds”. Further, Article 15 of the UNCRC protects children’s freedom to associate and peaceful assembly. These rights can only be restricted by provisions which are ‘necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order, the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.’ There may be reasons to restrict the presence of very young and unsupervised children at protests. However, the court’s order arbitrarily banned all children from the Shaheen-Bagh protest site, irrespective of their age and for an indefinite period. This wide ban is arbitrary and a manifestly disproportionate tool for realising any laudable aims under the Indian Constitution and in international law. In addition to violating children’s right to protest, the order also limits the participation of parents and other child caregivers. This will have a disproportionate impact on women as they bear the larger share of child care, limiting their right to freedom of expression and protest.In Unnikrishnan v. State of A.P., the SC held that Article 21 includes the protection of children’s right to educational opportunities and facilities for children to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity. Which of the following can be said to be not flowing from this interpretation?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. All of the following can be inferred from the passage except

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. What is the correct meaning of the word ‘infringement’?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice For which of the following can special provisions be made under Article 15 of the Constitution?1. Women and children2. Scheduled Tribes3. Economically backward classes4. Scheduled CastesSelect the correct answer using the code given below:a)1, 2, 3 and 4b)1 and 3c)2, 3 and 4d)1, 2 and 4Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup