Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - andldquo;Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...andrdquo; ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word andldquo;Chauvinismandrdquo; is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an ex...

Join the Discussion on the App

Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.

Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?

a)
As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.
b)
The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.
c)
Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.
d)
The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.
e)
Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Practice Test for NMAT - 8

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and ...

An “eponym” refers to 'A person after whom a discovery, invention, place, etc., is named or thought to be named' and “apocryphal” means 'of doubtful authenticity, although widely circulated as being true'. The source of the word “Chauvinism” is disputed, since it is assumed to have been derived from Nicholas Chauvin but there is not enough evidence to support the same. Option 1 alludes to this answer.
The remaining options do not portray the same meaning and hence, can be eliminated.
Hence, the correct answer is option 1.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What does the author hint upon through the usage of the phrase “moral superstructure”?

View answer

Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. On the basis of this passage, what could the term male chauvinism most likely mean?

View answer

Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What is the central focus of the passage?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:Once upon a time — just a few years ago, actually — it was not uncommon to see headlines about prominent scientists, tech executives, and engineers warning portentously that the revolt of the robots was nigh. The mechanism varied, but the result was always the same: Uncontrollable machine self-improvement would one day overcome humanity. A dismal fate awaited us.Today we fear a different technological threat, one that centers not on machines but other humans. We see ourselves as imperilled by the terrifying social influence unleashed by the Internet in general and social media in particular. We hear warnings that nothing less than our collective ability to perceive reality is at stake, and that if we do not take corrective action we will lose our freedoms and way of life.Primal terror of mechanical menace has given way to fear of angry primates posting. Ironically, the roles have reversed. The robots are now humanity’s saviors, suppressing bad human mass behavior online with increasingly sophisticated filtering algorithms. We once obsessed about how to restrain machines we could not predict or control — now we worry about how to use machines to restrain humans we cannot predict or control. But the old problem hasn’t gone away: How do we know whether the machines will do as we wish?The shift away from the fear of unpredictable robots and toward the fear of chaotic human behavior may have been inevitable. For the problem of controlling the machines was always at heart a problem of human desire — the worry that realizing our desires using automated systems might prove catastrophic. The promised solution was to rectify human desire. But once we lost optimism about whether this was possible, the stage was set for the problem to be flipped on its head.The twentieth-century cyberneticist Norbert Wiener made what was for his time a rather startling argument: "The machine may be the final instrument of doom, but humanity may be the ultimate cause." In his 1960 essay “Some Moral and Technical Consequences of Automation,” Wiener recounts tales in which a person makes a wish and gets what was requested but not necessarily what he or she really desired. Hence, its imperative that we be absolutely sure of what desire we put into the machine. Wiener was of course not talking about social media, but we can easily see the analogy: It too achieves purposes, like mob frenzy or erroneous post deletions, that its human designers did not actually desire, even though they built the machines in a way that achieves those purposes. Nor does he envision, as in Terminator, a general intelligence that becomes self-aware and nukes everyone. Rather, he imagined a system that humans cannot easily stop and that acts on a misleading substitute for the military objectives humans actually value.However, there is a risk in Wiener’s distinction between what we desire and what actually happens in the end. It may create a false image of ourselves — an image in which our desires and our behaviors are wholly separable from each other. Instead of examining carefully whether our desires are in fact good, we may simply assume they are, and so blame bad behavior on the messy cooperation between ourselves and the “system.”Q.The risk in Wieners distinction between what we desire and what actually happens, in the end, is that

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:Once upon a time — just a few years ago, actually — it was not uncommon to see headlines about prominent scientists, tech executives, and engineers warning portentously that the revolt of the robots was nigh. The mechanism varied, but the result was always the same: Uncontrollable machine self-improvement would one day overcome humanity. A dismal fate awaited us.Today we fear a different technological threat, one that centers not on machines but other humans. We see ourselves as imperilled by the terrifying social influence unleashed by the Internet in general and social media in particular. We hear warnings that nothing less than our collective ability to perceive reality is at stake, and that if we do not take corrective action we will lose our freedoms and way of life.Primal terror of mechanical menace has given way to fear of angry primates posting. Ironically, the roles have reversed. The robots are now humanity’s saviors, suppressing bad human mass behavior online with increasingly sophisticated filtering algorithms. We once obsessed about how to restrain machines we could not predict or control — now we worry about how to use machines to restrain humans we cannot predict or control. But the old problem hasn’t gone away: How do we know whether the machines will do as we wish?The shift away from the fear of unpredictable robots and toward the fear of chaotic human behavior may have been inevitable. For the problem of controlling the machines was always at heart a problem of human desire — the worry that realizing our desires using automated systems might prove catastrophic. The promised solution was to rectify human desire. But once we lost optimism about whether this was possible, the stage was set for the problem to be flipped on its head.The twentieth-century cyberneticist Norbert Wiener made what was for his time a rather startling argument: "The machine may be the final instrument of doom, but humanity may be the ultimate cause." In his 1960 essay “Some Moral and Technical Consequences of Automation,” Wiener recounts tales in which a person makes a wish and gets what was requested but not necessarily what he or she really desired. Hence, its imperative that we be absolutely sure of what desire we put into the machine. Wiener was of course not talking about social media, but we can easily see the analogy: It too achieves purposes, like mob frenzy or erroneous post deletions, that its human designers did not actually desire, even though they built the machines in a way that achieves those purposes. Nor does he envision, as in Terminator, a general intelligence that becomes self-aware and nukes everyone. Rather, he imagined a system that humans cannot easily stop and that acts on a misleading substitute for the military objectives humans actually value.However, there is a risk in Wiener’s distinction between what we desire and what actually happens in the end. It may create a false image of ourselves — an image in which our desires and our behaviors are wholly separable from each other. Instead of examining carefully whether our desires are in fact good, we may simply assume they are, and so blame bad behavior on the messy cooperation between ourselves and the “system.”Q.According to the author, what was the reason for the shift toward the fear of chaotic human behavior?

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Chauvinism, in its original meaning, is an exaggerated patriotism and a belligerent belief in national superiority and glory. Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal French soldier Nicholas Chauvin. By extension, it has come to include an extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of any group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards rival groups. In our enlightened times, when most forms of chauvinism have been abandoned, at least in theory, by those who consider themselves progressive, Western ethics still appears to retain, at its very heart, a fundamental form of chauvinism, namely, human chauvinism. For both popular Western thought and most Western ethical theories assume that both value and morality can ultimately be reduced to matters of interest or concern to the class of humans.Chauvinists are always anxious to stress distinguishing points between the privileged class and those outside it and there is no lack of characteristics which distinguish humans from non-humans, at least functioning healthy adult ones. The point is that these distinctions usually do not warrant the sort of radically inferior treatment for which they are proposed as a rationale. On the basis of the characteristics, then, the proposed radical difference in treatment between the privileged and non-privileged class and the purely instrumental treatment of the non-privileged class, must be warranted, that is, the distinguishing characteristics must be able to carry the moral superstructure placed upon them.Q. What can be understood by the statement - “Its eponym is a seemingly apocryphal...” ?a)As legend has it, the source of the word “Chauvinism” is Nicholas Chauvin.b)The partisanship was first practiced by Nicholas Chauvin.c)Nicholas Chauvin is responsible for the retention of chauvinism in western ethics.d)The practice of chauvinism has been abandoned to a great degree due to the efforts of Nicholas Chauvin.e)Nicholas Chauvin practiced the worst form of chauvinism - human chauvinism.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam