Question Description
Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passage:Article 25 guarantees the right to “profess, practice and propagate religion, but also permits the State to regulate „economic, financial, political or other secular activity associated with religious practice, as well as provide for „social welfare and reform of Hindu religious institutions. Article 26 guarantees religious denominations, among other things, freedom to manage their religious affairs. However, the protection is extended only to the practices considered essential to the religion. The State can still restrict the right on the grounds of public order, health and morality.Litigation around these two Articles has broadly centred on two issues. The first is the distinction between the religious and secular, particularly in the case of Hinduism. The Court has dealt with this by bringing into play an „essential practices test to decide what is essential to Hinduism and used it to distinguish between the sacred and the secular. The Court’s intervention to decide what is religious and what is not in a secular, constitutional culture is hardly peculiar to India. As Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, in most constitutional settings courts „have to determine whether or not a policy places a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. This might require the court to have not just a definition of religion but also to determine whether a particular practice counts as falling under that definition. What is unusual, however, is the Indian Supreme Court’s activism in fashioning religion in the way the State or the judges would likeit to be, rather than accept religion as practised by believers. The courts have upheld several practices as essential, but not along with the added elements and their outgrowths.(Ronojoy Sen, Secularism and Religious Freedom).Q.In 2019, the Government of India banned the pasting of religious pamphlets in public spaces. These pamphlets often carried the text of the key teachings of religions, and all religious sects engaged in this practice. One leader from a religion challenged this action of the government. His challenge will –a)Succeed as these pamphlets are just educating people about the fundamental tenets of his religion.b)Fail as putting up posters is not an essential practice to his religion.c)Fail as these pamphlets will lead to conversions which cannot be permitted.d)Succeed as doing this is a right of every citizen in a secular country.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.