Question Description
Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle 1 – The Principal is liable for all acts of the agent done in the course of employment.Principle 2 – When a servant commits a mistake while acting on behalf of his master, causing loss to the plaintiff thereby, the master will be liable for the same.Principle 3 – Generally, the employer is not liable for torts committed by an independent contractor working for him.Exception – The employer will be held liable for the acts of an independent contractor if he authorizes the doing of an illegal act.Explanation – An independent contractor is one who is not under the complete direction and control of the employer.Principle 4 – If the servant acts negligently in the performance of his duties or displays reckless behaviour, thereby causing loss to the plaintiff, the master will be held liable.Principle 5 – If the servant does an act in defiance of an express prohibition, and the act is outside the course of employment, then the master cannot be held liable for harm arising out of such an act.Facts – The South Western Railway Board appointed porters to assist passengers in boarding the right trains, as the crowds were large and the railway schedules were packed during the holiday season. Manu, a vagabond traveler had got into the right train bound for Kochi. However, the porter erroneously thought that he had boarded the wrong train and pulled him out and ensured that he takes another train leaving around the same time, which stopped at Kochi, but was actually bound for Kanyakumari. When the tickets were being checked, Manu was caught and fined for ticketless travelling, as the ticket he possessed was for a different train. Manu seeks to claim damages from the South Western Railway Board. Would they be held liable for the porter’s act?a)Yes, the Railway Board would be liable, as the porter is employed by the Board, and has committed a mistake.b)No, only the porter can be held liable. The mistake is entirely his.c)The Railway Board cannot be held liable, as the porter was honestly doing his job. The mistake was a mere accident on the part of the porter.d)The State should be held liable, as railways are managed by the state, usually.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.